Hi,
I have stumbled on the following problem with JBossMQ in 3.2.6:
org.jboss.mq.SpyJMSException: Could not store message: 77986 msg=42152 hard
NOT_STORED PERSISTENT
queue=TOPIC.polopolyCM_topic.eventdispatcher_polopolyclient.-2147483648
priority=4 lateClone=false hashCode=3716546; - nested thr
On 6 Mar, Stephen Davidson wrote:
> Hi Peter.
>
> The Application had been checking the information stored in the httpSession to see
>if the user had been authenticated. Then the SLSB was checking to see if the
>user was allowed to access the function requested. Btw, the current JAAS
>s
On 6 Mar, Stephen Davidson wrote:
>
> Ok, just updated, and now I get the attached stack-trace. What is happening is that
>a servlet is calling an SLSB, and that SLSB is trying to pop a message on a
> queue (as well as do some other operations). What is really disconcerting is the
>fact tha
On 21 Feb, Dirk Storck wrote:
>
>
> I have a SessionBean wich sends a message to a MDB. This processes the
> message an sends a new message to another topic to wich a standalone
> javaapplication has subscribed to. How do I achieve that the messages from
> MDB are not lost if the application sta
On 18 Jun, Robert Yen wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The platform is Sun SPARC with Solaris 2.7, JBoss 2.2.1.
> When I turned on "java.naming.provider.url=localhost" in jndi.properties,
> the jboss startup hung at -
> "[JBossMQ] Starting". It works fine if I turn it off and using a
> environment file (sy
On 18 Jun, Griffin, Michael wrote:
> This makes sense to me, but I can't seem to get it working.
>
> How do I use the JMS Connector?
>
> I created a resource reference in ejb-jar.xml, and linked the reference to
> QueueConnectionFactory in jboss.xml. The bean obtains the
> QueueConnectionFac
On 15 Jun, Griffin, Michael wrote:
> JBoss-User,
>
> I have created a MessageDrivenBean that serves as the responder in a request
> / reply scenario. I get the reply Destination from the JMSReplyTo property
> on the message. The handling of the onMessage code is simple.
>
> I lookup the QueueC
On 2 Jun, Phan Anh Tran wrote:
> Has anyone tried the following configuration using JBOSS?
>
>
> [JBOSS1][JBOSS2] [JBOSS3]
>
> JBOSS2 is the one running a message queue server instance, and JBOSS1 and
> JBOSS3 are the servers with MDBs. Does JBOSS support the described
> configuration?
On 26 Maj, Jubin Zawar wrote:
> Hi people,
>
Hi, interesting, but not joyable, results. My guess is that it is not
the MDB per se that is causing the problem, but JBossMQ. Have you any
possibilities to test the same scenario without using MDB (use normal
client subscribers) and see if the resu
Hi,
due to several recent questions regarding JMS, MDB on both dev and user
I tought I would sum up the status of JMS in JBoss and how "pluggable"
it is.
The JMS architecture of JBoss looks like this.
1. The JMS provider consists of JBossMQ. This is the part of JBoss that
implements the JMS 1
Appart from following the instructions below, there is a known problem
with durable stuff, where JBossMQ seems to stuff messages into the MDB
container before it has started the JMS connection. Normaly this means
that messages sent during downtime will be delivered when new messages
is comming int
On 27 Maj, Lars Olsson wrote:
> I have an application with two queues and two message driven beans:
>
> Client ---> q1 ---> mdbA ---> q2 ---> mdbB
>
> In the onMessage() method of mdbA the incoming message is inspected
> and then passed on to mdbB via q2.
>
> Bean mdbA uses container man
On 15 Maj, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Now i see the light! :-o
> Last question (by the moment):
> How to use the same Topic with 2 or more subscribers?
> Perhaps, for every subscriber, have i to indicate in
> its 'jboss.xml' the same line:
>
> topic/sameTopic ?
Thats correct. You could resue ev
On 15 Maj, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hi list !
>
> we are going to benchmark jboss for messaging.
>
Great, and you will post the results I guess!
Have you looked into the little benchmarking application done by
progress (soniqmq, maybe you could use something from there)?
//Peter
> scenario
On 14 Maj, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thank you Per!!
>
> The origin of this confusion is a sample in JBoss Documentation,
> making more specific: example called "MDB as a Listener".
>
> How many "subscribers" appear in this example?
> I think a subscriber is 'Worker Bean', isn't it?
> Then, to
On 9 Maj, Cecilie Aulesjord wrote:
> Hi.
> I'm trying to read messages from a topic. I've a publisher session bean that
> publishes messages and the server-log confirms that these messages has been
> set. Then I have a message driven bean that is deployed like this in the
> ejb-jar.xml:
> --
On 2 Maj, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Never mind. I see that one must close one's QueueConnection, or the main
> thread won't die. Perhaps the test case should be updated by someone with
> permissions.
OK. Fixed!
//Peter
>
> Wes
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mail
On 25 Apr, John Dahle wrote:
> Hello--
> I am having problems getting JBossMQ to start on my Windows 2000 machine. I
> ran the thing straight out of the "box" and have removed any CLASSPATH
> variables from my environmental variables. Any thoughts or help to get the
> JBossMQ started would be appr
On 23 Apr, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello again:
>
> (JBoss Documentation, Chapter 7 "Writing Message Driven Bean")
>
> After deploying de MDB.class + META-INF i've began to
> write the 'Main.java' application in order to send a stuff
> to my bean.
> The problem arrives when compiling this fil
On 17 Apr, Scott M Stark wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 11:16 AM
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Using JMS resources (or other resources)
>
>
>>
>> Well, I naively tried that:
>>
>> localhost:1199/topi
On 17 Apr, Scott M Stark wrote:
>
> On 17 Apr: Peter Antman wrote:
>> Wow, seems to be almost exactly what I need. It does also look like this
>> could solve our little problem with the JMS objects not being in the
>> java: namespace.
>>
>
>> Then we could write an mbean entry like this:
>>
>
On 16 Apr, Alexander Kogan wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>
>> Is it possible to contsruct some sort of factory that rules a complete
>> subcontext. An example: Suppose I want to send JMS messages from server
>> A to B. At A I would like to define a namspace like this:
>> java/serverB-jms
On 13 Apr, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Another JMS question, how should I go about creating a session such that its
> transactional context is consistent with the executing bean? I assume that
> the resource manager fluff is there to deal with some of this? Should I
> assume that the session is transa
After some source code reading I have gotten to the following
conclusion. To use URL, do this.
In ejb-jar:
MyURL
java.net.URL
Container
In jboss.xml
urlref
http://some.website.org/page.html
On 13 Apr, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Hello, I am getting an odd naming exception when I try to lookup the
> connection factory:
Hi, this will not work in JBoss due to a feature in ApplicationMetaData.
A JNDI pointed out in a res-jndi-name must be part of the java:
namespace. If java: is not found in
25 matches
Mail list logo
