Yes some of the reserved range will be lost if the session bean gets removed from the
pool or if JBoss is shutdown, this is something you would need to be prepared to
accept.
The other issue that you would need to be aware of is that the integers will not
necesarily be used in order, as multipl
Excellent. Middlegen does indeed generate one (or rather both) EJBs.
I appreciate the reasons for the session bean, now that I'm looking at the code, but
isn't the bean going to get cached by JBoss at any point and lose the sequence block?
In which case it will have to get a new block and if it
anonymous wrote : Apparently it should be hidden behind a session bean, but I guess
that's just a bit tra-la-la for now.
No the session bean is the most important part of this pattern, it is the stateless
session bean that caches a reserved range of integers.
anonymous wrote : I hope you know
IIRC middlegen has support for generating code for this pattern.
-marek
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3827574#3827574";>View
the original post
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3827574>Reply
to the post
--
