http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3877273#3877273
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3877273
---
This S
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : There is a bug in (I think 3.2.5 and/or 3.2.6) that
causes session timeout to stay at 30 minutes if you are also using cluster.
I'm pretty sure this is fixed in 3.2.7.
|
| Stan Silvert
Stan, is there a "bugzilla" or the equivalent for JBoss that you could point
Hmm, that's interesting. Our team's development workstations use 3.2.5 JBoss
although the production site is at 3.2.1. (Stupid, I know, but it hasn't
caused many problems). So, I'll ask, did this problem exist before 3.2.5?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&o
There is a bug in (I think 3.2.5 and/or 3.2.6) that causes session timeout to
stay at 30 minutes if you are also using cluster. I'm pretty sure this is
fixed in 3.2.7.
Stan Silvert
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3877145#3877145
Reply to the
After doing a little further research, I can now confirm that the value that
the JBoss web console displays is measured in seconds, which is different from
how it is specified in web.xml (in minutes). Changing the web.xml value to
"60" caused the web console display to change to "3600". So the
Thanks, Scott.
However, I'm not sure it answers the question.
Here is the comment from http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-app_2_3.dtd
"The session-timeout element defines the default session timeout
interval for all sessions created in this web application. The
specified timeout must be expressed in a
1 min = 60 seconds.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3876633#3876633
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3876633
---
This SF.Net email is spon
Can nobody answer this question?
If the session timeout value in web.xml is not being respected, what could be
overriding it?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3876600#3876600
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=post
