Guy Rouillier wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Rick LaBanca" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 7:53 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Feature idea
Jetty is separate but the jboss folks seem to want to treat it as the
official js
server of
choice.
- Original Message -
From: "Guy Rouillier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 5:32 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Feature idea
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Rick LaBanca" <[EMAI
- Original Message -
From: "Rick LaBanca" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 7:53 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Feature idea
> Jetty is separate but the jboss folks seem to want to treat it as the
> official jsp porti
-
From: "Guy Rouillier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 11:23 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Feature idea
> - Original Message -
> From: "Rod Macpherson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
its easy enough for some interceptor expert.
Ciao,
Jonathan O'Connor
David Corbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
28.02.2003 13:02
Please respond to jboss-user
To: JBoss User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:[JBoss-user] Feature
- Original Message -
From: "Rod Macpherson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 2:51 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Feature idea
> > JBoss is an EJB engine. What kind of "page" are you talking about?
I
> >
ella label for the complete J2EE stack including JMS,
JCA, JSP and so on.
Rod
- Original Message -
From: "Guy Rouillier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "JBoss User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 4:44 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Feature idea
Guy Rouillier wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "David Corbin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "JBoss User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 8:02 AM
Subject: [JBoss-user] Feature idea
The one thing I'd like to see jboss provide. When I a
- Original Message -
From: "David Corbin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "JBoss User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 8:02 AM
Subject: [JBoss-user] Feature idea
> The one thing I'd like to see jboss provide. When I an applicatio
lease respond to jboss-user
To: JBoss User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: [JBoss-user] Feature idea
The one thing I'd like to see jboss provide. When I an application is
redeployed, I'd like to see JBoss accept requests for the context o
potential for havoc is
pretty high is it not?
- Original Message -
From: "Pete Beck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 6:44 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Feature idea
> Or even better, keep the old application deployed wh
We've planned for a long time to have a "valve" that makes invocations
wait when a component is being redeployed, but no one has implemented it
yet. My idea for this would involve a timeout: if the component gets
finished redeploying before the timeout, the waiting invocations just get
processed,
Or even better, keep the old application deployed while the new
application is being deployed.
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 13:02, David Corbin wrote:
> The one thing I'd like to see jboss provide. When I an application is
> redeployed, I'd like to see JBoss accept requests for the context of the
> a
The one thing I'd like to see jboss provide. When I an application is
redeployed, I'd like to see JBoss accept requests for the context of the
application, and return a page that says "Please try again in a few
moments". Even better would be some way to configure the response. The
key point
14 matches
Mail list logo
