Re: [JBoss-user] JMX and ear-scope (too much protection?)

2002-09-13 Thread Michael Bartmann
David Jencks wrote: Did you look at how ServiceCreator does it? That might work for you also. Basically you ask the mbeanserver to create your object (sub-service) for you using a specific classloader, then it remembers for you, you don't need to worry about the mbeanRegistry. I want to

Re: [JBoss-user] JMX and ear-scope

2002-09-12 Thread Michael Bartmann
Hi Adrian, Your workaround sounds ok, but I have some 20 ear-scoped applications, with the same single offending method in each, so I decided to stay with my serialization below the API with a byte[] arg. (I can do this by myself, but the management GUI is written by Mehrdad (remember him?),

Re: [JBoss-user] JMX and ear-scope

2002-09-12 Thread Adrian Brock
: Michael Bartmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] JMX and ear-scope Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 15:03:15 +0200 Hi Adrian, Your workaround sounds ok, but I have some 20 ear-scoped applications, with the same single offending method in each, so I

Re: [JBoss-user] JMX and ear-scope

2002-09-12 Thread Michael Bartmann
Ok, this is what I found out so far: In my root-service I implement MBeanRegistration to obtain the jmxserver to register further sub-services to. This implements MBeanServer. This is where I register my MBeans calling registerMBean(..). But the class I queried the org.jboss.mx.classloader

Re: [JBoss-user] JMX and ear-scope

2002-09-12 Thread Michael Bartmann
Hi Adrian, arghh, I think I am doing registration terribly wrong. There is sth which I didn't tell you, because I didn't think it was of any relevance. The MBeans involved are my own JMSProvider. The root-service is: fs4p.eartest:service=MS4PServer This one provides a non-null result when I

Re: [JBoss-user] JMX and ear-scope

2002-09-12 Thread David Jencks
Did you look at how ServiceCreator does it? That might work for you also. Basically you ask the mbeanserver to create your object (sub-service) for you using a specific classloader, then it remembers for you, you don't need to worry about the mbeanRegistry. (all of this as I recall) david

Re: [JBoss-user] JMX and ear-scope

2002-09-11 Thread Adrian Brock
PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-user] JMX and ear-scope Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 18:59:07 +0200 Suppose I have two classes ClassA (an MBean) and ClassB (implements Serializable). Both classes live inside an ear-scope. There is an instance of ClassA which is registered with the JMX-server. ClassA has

[JBoss-user] JMX and ear-scope

2002-09-10 Thread Michael Bartmann
Suppose I have two classes ClassA (an MBean) and ClassB (implements Serializable). Both classes live inside an ear-scope. There is an instance of ClassA which is registered with the JMX-server. ClassA has a method void m(ClassB b). This method m is called through an RMIAdaptor from an other JVM,