oss 2"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 2:26 AM
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] The State of EJB2.0 in JBoss
>
>
> > Local interfaces? I guess that's not too big of a deal since the code
can
> > easily be changed later...
> >
&g
Hi,
How about the required Corba (RMI/IIOP) support??
Burkhard
- Original Message -
From: "Hunter Hillegas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jim Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "JBoss 2"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 2:26 AM
Subjec
Local interfaces? I guess that's not too big of a deal since the code can
easily be changed later...
Hunter
> From: Jim Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 20:17:41 -0400
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Hunter Hillegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subjec
Hi Hunter...
--On Wednesday, May 30, 2001 10:23 AM -0700 Hunter Hillegas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am I correct that JBoss currently does support EJB1.1 + MDB?
Yes, this is correct.
So between MVC Soft and jBoss MDBs, what are you missing?
Jim
***
Hunter Hillegas wrote:
> I know that the spec isn't completed and that JBoss will support EJB2.0 when
> it is final but...
>
> Does this mean that work hasn't started or that work in underway (I haven't
> checked CVS)?
'underway' in that MDB and business methods on home interfaces both
work.
I know that the spec isn't completed and that JBoss will support EJB2.0 when
it is final but...
Does this mean that work hasn't started or that work in underway (I haven't
checked CVS)?
Just wondering if we should expect something soon after the spec goes final
or if that is when the work will b
