Re: [JBoss-user] Using a new JDBC datasource

2001-06-06 Thread Georg Rehfeld
Hi Justin, > javax.ejb.EJBException > org.jboss.ejb.plugins.BMPPersistenceManager.storeEntity >(BMPPersistenceManager.java:352) > org.jboss.ejb.plugins.EntitySynchronizationInterceptor >$InstanceSynchronization.beforeCompletion >(EntitySynchroniztionInterceptor.java:370) The code at

Re: [JBoss-user] Using a new JDBC datasource

2001-06-05 Thread Justin Harrison
OK Sorry that I need such a lot of hand holding. > I think you can use org.jboss.jdbc.JDBCDataSourceLoader instead of > XADataSourceLoader in jboss.jcml when setting up your pool. This, I > think, will give you a non-transactional pool. > > Toby. So I tried changing the jcml file to a JDBC so

Re: [JBoss-user] Using a new JDBC datasource

2001-06-05 Thread Justin Harrison
On 6 Jun 2001, at 7:16, Toby Allsopp wrote: > On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 05:43:57PM +1200, Justin Harrison wrote: > > JBoss is trying to setAutoCommit to false to support transactions when it >initialises the > > datasource My driver throws an exception when that happens. So I assume that means >i

Re: [JBoss-user] Using a new JDBC datasource

2001-06-05 Thread Toby Allsopp
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 10:24:53AM +1200, Justin Harrison wrote: > > > Can I still use this JDBC driver? > > > > It depends what you need to do with it. If you need to have multiple > > statements included in a single transaction then no, you can't. > > I will take what I can get. What do I nee

Re: [JBoss-user] Using a new JDBC datasource

2001-06-05 Thread Justin Harrison
On 6 Jun 2001, at 7:16, Toby Allsopp wrote: > On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 05:43:57PM +1200, Justin Harrison wrote: > > JBoss is trying to setAutoCommit to false to support transactions when it >initialises the datasource > > My driver throws an exception when that happens. So I assume that means i

Re: [JBoss-user] Using a new JDBC datasource

2001-06-05 Thread Justin Harrison
> Might be, your driver accepts setAutoCommit(false) without > throwing an exception, but silently ignores it and remains > in autocommit mode? My mistake I didnt have logging set up properly. So does this mean my driver is a no go? > Is Cobol transactional at all? Cobol is not transactional

Re: [JBoss-user] Using a new JDBC datasource

2001-06-05 Thread Toby Allsopp
On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 05:43:57PM +1200, Justin Harrison wrote: > JBoss is trying to setAutoCommit to false to support transactions when it >initialises the datasource > My driver throws an exception when that happens. So I assume that means it doesn't >support transactions:-(. Yes, that's mor

Re: [JBoss-user] Using a new JDBC datasource

2001-06-04 Thread Justin Harrison
JBoss is trying to setAutoCommit to false to support transactions when it initialises the datasource My driver throws an exception when that happens. So I assume that means it doesn't support transactions:-(. JBoss ignores the exception thrown by my JDBC driver is that wise? Can I still use thi

Re: [JBoss-user] Using a new JDBC datasource

2001-06-04 Thread Georg Rehfeld
Hi Justin, > id : XidImpl [FormatId=257, GlobalId=justin//0, BranchQual=1] > twoPhase : true > active : false > current : XidImpl [FormatId=257, GlobalId=justin//0, BranchQual=1] > Con transaction isolation level : 1 > Con is closed : false > Con is read only : false > Con is auto commit : true

Re: [JBoss-user] Using a new JDBC datasource

2001-06-04 Thread Toby Allsopp
On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 10:55:28AM +1200, Justin Harrison wrote: > Hi > > Weekend research. > > > The level of support for transactions, specifically the JTA > extensions to > > JDBC 2.0, is important to know. > > The driver is JDBC 1.2 type 4 compliant written in JDK 1.1.7. Ok, it doesn

Re: [JBoss-user] Using a new JDBC datasource

2001-06-04 Thread Justin Harrison
Hi Weekend research. > The level of support for transactions, specifically the JTA extensions to > JDBC 2.0, is important to know. The driver is JDBC 1.2 type 4 compliant written in JDK 1.1.7. > What you might want to do (because I don't have time) is to check out the > latest CVS code, in whic

Re: [JBoss-user] Using a new JDBC datasource

2001-05-31 Thread Toby Allsopp
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 11:20:34AM +1200, Justin Harrison wrote: > Hi > > > > > The level of support for transactions, specifically the JTA extensions to > > JDBC 2.0, is important to know. > > > > If the driver does not support these extensions is it a waste of time or is it worth >battling

Re: [JBoss-user] Using a new JDBC datasource

2001-05-31 Thread Justin Harrison
Hi > > The level of support for transactions, specifically the JTA extensions to > JDBC 2.0, is important to know. > If the driver does not support these extensions is it a waste of time or is it worth battling on? I have got an e-mail into the company that provided it hoping to get some spe

[JBoss-user] Using a new JDBC datasource

2001-05-31 Thread Justin Harrison
s implemented? > Burkhard. > - Original Message - > From: "Justin Harrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 6:40 AM > Subject: [JBoss-user] Using a new JDBC datasource > > > > Hi > > >

Re: [JBoss-user] Using a new JDBC datasource

2001-05-31 Thread Toby Allsopp
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 04:40:29PM +1200, Justin Harrison wrote: > Hi Hi. Please excuse the brevity of this response. As I said, I'm short on time. > I am trying to integrate a new datasource into JBoss as a proof of concept for my >boss. > > The jdbc driver is from a company called Transoft

Re: [JBoss-user] Using a new JDBC datasource

2001-05-31 Thread Burkhard Vogel
Hi, can you tell how > con = this.getCobolConnection(); is implemented? Burkhard. - Original Message - From: "Justin Harrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 6:40 AM Subject: [JBoss-user] Using a new JDBC d

[JBoss-user] Using a new JDBC datasource

2001-05-30 Thread Justin Harrison
Hi I am trying to integrate a new datasource into JBoss as a proof of concept for my boss. The jdbc driver is from a company called Transoft which provides access to AcuCOBOL Vision files. It works very well for client server connections but thats about all that I know. I am not sure what fea