-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> another idea is to deploy a DIRECTORY,and not a WAR in jboss/deploy
> ... this should work in latest jboss3.0 as far as I've heard here,
> but I don't know if it is supported with jboss244...
> maybe does there already exist another patch to suppo
> -Message d'origine-
> De: Jarecsni János [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> thank you for the answer, and sorry for not responding
> earlier! Currently
> I'm evaluting the possible solutions to the problem.
I'm working on the Virtual host support on jboss244+catalina ...
I'll have just t
Hi!
thank you for the answer, and sorry for not responding earlier! Currently
I'm evaluting the possible solutions to the problem. Someone suggested I
should use Apache in front of JBoss+Catalina (or Tomcat, it doesn't matter
in this respect).
It's relatively easy to set up vhosts under Apache an
Hi,
we'd like to set up a virtual host for one of our J2EE apps. Now we have a
context (/istore) under which our application can be accessed. The URL of
our app now is: http://xxx.yyy.com/istore/
However we'd like the following URL to work: http://virtual.host.com/ So
we'd set up our DNS server
>
> What about Jetty? It seems to me Jetty is able to do this. Do you
> recommend
> using Jetty in place of tomcat?
>
Use Jetty. It's a better web-server. Supposedly, Jetty is much faster than
Tomcat 3.x. I don't know about Tomcat 4.x. I've used Jetty in production
at 2 different places and w
ael Angelo Libio
|Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 8:03 AM
|To: Guy Rouillier; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] virtual hosts again
|
|
|name-based virtual servers are recognizable under tomcat 3.2.3.
|...so, under server.xml (tomcat's) you should have configured two
|context with
|Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 8:03 AM
|To: Guy Rouillier; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] virtual hosts again
|
|
|name-based virtual servers are recognizable under tomcat 3.2.3.
|...so, under server.xml (tomcat's) you should have configured two context
|with their respec
Guy Rouillier
|Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 7:03 AM
|To: JBoss-List
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] virtual hosts again
|
|
|What version of Tomcat? The latest I've used is 3.2.3, and that doesn't
|recognized name-based virtual servers - only IP based virtual servers.
|
|- Original Messa
r" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "JBoss-List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:02 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] virtual hosts again
> What version of Tomcat? The latest I've used is 3.2.3, and that doesn't
> recognized name-based virtual server
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 6:26 AM
Subject: [JBoss-user] virtual hosts again
Hi,
sorry for bringing up this question again but noone answered and still I
think it's a fundamental question. Maybe I was a bit obscure in my previous
mail or maybe my English was hard to get :)
So h
Hi,
sorry for bringing up this question again but noone answered and still I
think it's a fundamental question. Maybe I was a bit obscure in my previous
mail or maybe my English was hard to get :)
So here's what we'd like to do:
1. say we host two domains www.foo.com and www.bar.com
2. we have
11 matches
Mail list logo