Re: JDEBug vs Win2K and/or NT4: Status?

2001-05-08 Thread Paul Kinnucan
- Original Message - From: "Javier Lopez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "John L. Utz III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Paul Kinnucan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 2:33 PM Subject: RE: JDEBug vs Win2K and/

RE: JDEBug vs Win2K and/or NT4: Status?

2001-05-08 Thread Javier Lopez
ng to the process. Javier -Original Message- From: John L. Utz III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 1:01 PM To: Paul Kinnucan Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: JDEBug vs Win2K and/or NT4: Status? hi paul; i have time to work on this again over the next few

RE: JDEBug vs Win2K and/or NT4: Status?

2001-05-08 Thread John L. Utz III
to pursue it, here is some background. One of the > >> steps performed by JDEbug when launching an application is to create a > server > >> socket. JDEbug allows Java to choose the port number of the server socket > >> (e.g., 1900). JDEbug then sends this port number back to

RE: JDEBug vs Win2K and/or NT4: Status?

2001-04-27 Thread Paul Kinnucan
gt;then >> triees to connect to the socket on the specified port. What appears is that >> somehow, on some systems, the port number gets bumped by 1 so that JDEbug is >> waiting on port 1901 while the JDE is trying to connect to port 1900. >> >> Any thoughts as to why this mig

RE: JDEBug vs Win2K and/or NT4: Status?

2001-04-27 Thread John L. Utz III
s > waiting on port 1901 while the JDE is trying to connect to port 1900. > > Any thoughts as to why this might be happening? > > - Paul > > > > > Javier > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jim Goodwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE

Re: JDEBug vs Win2K and/or NT4: Status?

2001-04-27 Thread Paul Kinnucan
r file, I'll give >it a spin and see what happens. > >- Original Message - >From: "Paul Kinnucan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Javier Lopez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jim Goodwin" ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: JDEBug vs Win2K and/or NT4: Status?

2001-04-27 Thread Paul Kinnucan
he port number gets bumped by 1 so that JDEbug is waiting on port 1901 while the JDE is trying to connect to port 1900. Any thoughts as to why this might be happening? - Paul > > Javier > > > -Original Message- > From: Jim Goodwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent

Re: JDEBug vs Win2K and/or NT4: Status?

2001-04-27 Thread Martin Dickau
Title: JDEBug vs Win2K and/or NT4: Status? The timeout problem still happens to me on Windows 2000 SP1.  It does not happen on Windows 2000 without SP1.   In the Messages buffer: No response to command 1. (process = 1; timeout = 30 sec.) At this point, it's pretty much dead.  There

RE: JDEBug vs Win2K and/or NT4: Status?

2001-04-27 Thread Javier Lopez
Title: JDEBug vs Win2K and/or NT4: Status? I tried it on simple class, (JDE->Debug App) and I get something like Error: debugger didn't respond to command:-1 2607 launch 12 -vmexec javaw -classic   or something like No response to command 2612. (process = 13; timeout = 30 sec

JDEBug vs Win2K and/or NT4: Status?

2001-04-27 Thread Jim Goodwin
Title: JDEBug vs Win2K and/or NT4: Status? Hi all, I see in the mail-traffic that Paul K has changed the JDEBug code to avoid setting priority on the thread when launching the debuggee process, in an effort to cure the problems with deadlocking at launch. What has not appeared is any user