Re: New version of Jikes

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > >> Kevin A. Burton wrote: >> >> David Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> ... >> - second round of JPDA pampering; believed to make it happy now >> ... >>

Re: New version of Jikes

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Kevin A. Burton wrote: > > >> David Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ... > >> - second round of JPDA pampering; believed to make it happy now > ... > > > What would make you believe this. Does it state *anywhere* tha

RE: New version of Jikes

Kevin A. Burton wrote: >> David Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ... >> - second round of JPDA pampering; believed to make it happy now ... > What would make you believe this. Does it state *anywhere* that Jikes is > capable of being 100% compatible with JPDA bytecode? The line containing, "

Re: New version of Jikes

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just received notice that Jikes 1.15 was available. Of particular note to > those on this list was this item: > > - second round of JPDA pampering; believed to make it happy now > > I haven't tested it y

New version of Jikes

I just received notice that Jikes 1.15 was available. Of particular note to those on this list was this item: - second round of JPDA pampering; believed to make it happy now I haven't tested it yet, but hopefully this means that we can now use Jikes and the java debugger! David