Re: [JDEV] Jabber, the Name

2001-05-16 Thread Flora Brunas
--- temas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I feel this horribly distorts my points into a corporate view. Jabber.Com made no progress on getting people to do mundane tasks, and they have not yet made any progress on getting people to do mundane tasks. They are still carried out by by the people

RE: [JDEV] Jabber, the Name

2001-05-16 Thread zad
Thank you temas. I was just about to say that. May I suggest Members list, maybe ! zad -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of temas Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 8:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JDEV] Jabber, the Name Wow

Re: [JDEV] Jabber DevZone News - Joining the Foundation

2001-05-16 Thread Rahul Dave
Thanks, I was assuming jabber.org, now why didnt I try that? Rahul I got this from you: I believe it checks to make sure you put a [EMAIL PROTECTED] style name. --temas On 15 May 2001 22:22:02 -0400, Rahul Dave wrote: Perhaps its just me, but I still keep hetting the form back with

Re[2]: [JDEV] (no subject)

2001-05-16 Thread Thomas Parslow (PatRat)
DOS attack, anyone? Or just ring the 0800 number to complain if your in the UK, costs them :) Thomas Parslow (PatRat) ICQ #:26359483 Rat Software http://www.rat-software.com/ Please leave quoted text in place when replying ___ jdev mailing list

Re: [JDEV] Jabber, the Name

2001-05-16 Thread Thomas Charron
From: Jens Alfke Subject: Re: [JDEV] Jabber, the Name I see a few more choices. There's a distinction between using the name Jabber as part of a product name, vs. simply declaring the product as Jabber compatible (and of course using the word Jabber or the light bulb logo in the UI.) This is

[JDEV] Re: Apple Mac OS X : announcing alpha release of Jabber 1.4.1

2001-05-16 Thread Jabber Developer
Eliot the license is exactly the same one as jabber license... If you look the content of the tarball it's exactly the same content of the tarball you can download from jabber.org except the changes in various place in the source or configuration file (check out :

Re: Client Capabilities Namespace and RE: [JDEV] Jabber, the Name

2001-05-16 Thread Peter Millard
Mike - One of the things that jabber browsing was supposed to do was to enable clients to check for capabilities.. so my client would send an iq type=get to=[EMAIL PROTECTED]/clientquery xmlns=jabber:iq:browse//iq, and the other client would respond to that query with a list of all the

RE: Client Capabilities Namespace and RE: [JDEV] Jabber, the Name

2001-05-16 Thread Emswiler, Mike
Agreed. And to avoid your timeout scenario, this query functionality could be a requirement for Jabber compatibility testing :) Michael J. Emswiler Director, Software Engineering PROTRADER Securities 504 Lavaca St., Suite 1000 Austin, Texas 78701 voice512.479.7300 fax 512.479.7301

Re: [JDEV] newbie question, can anyone show me a working version of a jabber.xml with transports added to it?

2001-05-16 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
Hallo Nic, I have posted my configuration files for running the server both as a single process and for running it as multiple processes (i.e., separate processes for add-on services such as conferencing and the transports) on my site at http://jabber.to/xml/ -- however I have not updated

Re: [JDEV] Jabber DevZone News - Joining the Foundation

2001-05-16 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
BTW, I fixed the problems with the form in IE. Let me know if you continue to experience trouble with the form. Peter Peter Saint-Andre wrote: Sorry about that, we had some troubles with the form right at the beginning. You might want to retry now. Peter Emswiler, Mike wrote: This

[JDEV] Re: [Mac-dev] Apple Mac OS X : announcing alpha release of Jabber1.4.1

2001-05-16 Thread Max Horn
Wonderful I will test this ASAP at my home machine. Thanks for your efforts. I am sure that most changes can be included in the official CVS immediatly, only the slightly spooky changes to mio.c might need some review (as you said yourself, somebody who is a mio+pth guru [jer? temas?

[JDEV] Re: [Mac-dev] Apple Mac OS X : announcing alpha release of Jabber1.4.1

2001-05-16 Thread Max Horn
At 14:07 Uhr -0400 16.05.2001, Jason Jobe wrote: I have built and installed pth-1.4.0. make test returns eveything OK. Make sure to build WITHOUT -O2 set. In using pth-1.4, I was able to get rid of the MACOSX changes involving the pth calls. I then updated platform-settings as follows:

[JDEV] Getting a 404 trying to create a chat room with jabber:iq:conference

2001-05-16 Thread Jens Alfke
Still working on implementing chat. Since the 1.4 server how-to document insists that generic conferencing is implemented via conference.so, that's what I'm implementing. This is a straight 1.4.1 server and conference.so running on Solaris with no special setup beyond what's given in the how-to

[JDEV] test suite

2001-05-16 Thread Dustin Puryear
The original release of the test suite was a working prototype. Naturally, I have scratched it and am now building the suite proper. Please feel free to check it out from CVS and make contributes, test the code, or just use it. Currently, I only have a working version of msgblast (send as many

Re: [JDEV] trouble compiling dpsm

2001-05-16 Thread Dustin Puryear
Benoit Orihuela wrote: You also need to make modifications to the Makefile. I've added -I../jabberd in the CFLAGS sections. I've also had to remove connection.o from the objects list and add client.o After that, dpsm should compile well ... I found I also needed ../jabberd/lib/karma.o to

[JDEV] Re: Apple Mac OS X : announcing alpha release of Jabber 1.4.1

2001-05-16 Thread Jabber Developer
Jason what exactly did you do to have it work ? We just try with pth- 1.4.0 but without success : - if we build pth-1.4.0 as a library installed in /usr/local when compiling jabber it complains for 2 missing symbols - if you modify the Makefile inside jabberd to use only pth- 1.4.0 it compiles

[JDEV] transport ids passwords

2001-05-16 Thread Tony Byers
Has anyone made changes so that the transport id and password are stored on the client side rather than the server or is there a reason why this couldn't be done. Tony ___ To get your own FREE ZDNet Onebox - FREE voicemail, email,

[JDEV] good discussion

2001-05-16 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
We had a good discussion regarding the Jabber Foundation in the [EMAIL PROTECTED] meeting room just now. A log is here: http://perl.jabber.org/logs/conference.jabber.org/foundation/2001-05-16.html Another Foundation meeting will be held in the same room at 22:00 UTC (about 2 hours from the

RE: [JDEV] good discussion

2001-05-16 Thread Emswiler, Mike
Sorry I missed it - and will miss the next one, too - bad day for me. But after reviewing the log, here's my $0.02 worth (assuming we live in an open source democracy): I vote to call the protocol IMTP (Instant Messaging Transport Protocol) ala HTTP, FTP, et. al. I think Jabber Powered or

[JDEV] using dpsm..

2001-05-16 Thread Dustin Puryear
Okay, one more question about dpsm. I have removed the c2s section in jabber.xml and replaced it with: service id='dpsm' accept ip/ port5225/port secretdp5m/secret /accept /service I then try and run dpsm, but get the error: Starting up... configure()...

RE: [JDEV] good discussion

2001-05-16 Thread Michael Bauer
We've moved this discussion to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to keep jdev focused on, well, dev. -Original Message- From: Julian Missig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 2:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JDEV] good discussion 'Jabber' is, and always has been, the

RE: [JDEV] good discussion

2001-05-16 Thread temas
Jabelin is not the server name, it is still jabberd (as it probably always will be). Rather, it is the name of the server development team. --temas On 16 May 2001 15:43:23 -0500, Emswiler, Mike wrote: Sorry I missed it - and will miss the next one, too - bad day for me. But after reviewing

[JDEV] Fix to make Jabberd on Solaris deal with SSL

2001-05-16 Thread Andrew J Cosgriff
On my Solaris 7 box, the SSL_accept in _mio_ssl_accept (mio_ssl.c:168) causes an SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ, which means you're just meant to call SSL_accept again until the error goes away. ...but you won't find this out unless you change ERR_get_error() to SSL_get_error(ssl,ret), just below (line