-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
For those of you interested in experimenting with federated/third party
authentication against (in this example) the jabber mesh of servers:
http://research.covalent.net/mod_auth_jabber/.
It is just a simple mod_auth_* module. It'll auth any
"Ashvil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>What this means is that the W3C can create a recommendation that becomes a
defato web standard and any implementation will/may have to pay royalties.
>
>For example, SVG implementers would/could have to pay royalties. I rather have no
SVG 'Web Standard' th
The JEP is here:
http://foundation.jabber.org/jeps/jep-0004.html
Peter
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Tom Jackson wrote:
> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> >
> > OK, cool. I agree that XForms looks heavy but there were some features
> > that I liked (separation between content and presentation being foremost
At 09:34 AM 10/2/2001 -0400, you wrote:
> > Finally, I don't think this should be part of the security JIG. Security
> > and authentication are two different things. Security is about ensuring
>
>Actually, I disagree - in fact, we're having discussions about these very
>things on security-jig.
I
Ok, I think we've got it this time. Current CVS works on the places I
could test that didn't work previously. I would love if people could
test this ASAP and let me know so it can be in 1.4.2.
--temas
PGP signature
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>
> OK, cool. I agree that XForms looks heavy but there were some features
> that I liked (separation between content and presentation being foremost
> in my mind).
>
> Send me the newer JEP or just updated it in CVS so I can post the revised
> version. :)
Where is the
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 01:03:43PM -0500, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Right now most people write server-side components in C, C++, or Java. For
> C people seem to mostly roll their own, for Java folks seem to use
> JabberBeans (http://jabberbeans.org/) as an underlying library (or just
> write it
The hash + sequence values are for zero-k authentication.. Checkout:
http://docs.jabber.org/draft-proto/html/zerok.html
for docs.. Also, if you see returned, you should still be able to
authenticate, but 0k auth is a "stronger" mechanism for auth'ing... Winjab
(actually JabberCOM does this) aut
The + (and are for (optional) zero-knowledge
authentication, but you can just send your and authenticate that
way. For more on zero-knowledge auth, go here:
http://docs.jabber.org/draft-proto/html/zerok.html
Peter
--
Peter Saint-Andre
email/jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://www.saint-an
Right now most people write server-side components in C, C++, or Java. For
C people seem to mostly roll their own, for Java folks seem to use
JabberBeans (http://jabberbeans.org/) as an underlying library (or just
write it all from scratch), and for C++ people are starting to use the
JECL librarie
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 10:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JDEV] Jabberd config file & namespaces
> ...
>
> The spec doesn't say anything about not containing ':'..if you look at
> the example namespa
I'm writing my own special purpose Jabber client and am having trouble with
the authentication. I am able to connect to Jabber.com with the following
exchange:
SEND:jdbray
RECV:jdbray
I respond with the hashed digest. However, when I attempt to connect to
jabber.org I get a different response
Thanks for the response. Yeah, i searched at jabber.org and the only
useful docs i could find is the Jabberd API and libxode API. C, C++ will be
fine with me, (i think java will not fit here, but i am more conversant with
java that with C, C++). As far i could find, i only see most of the modu
Or if you have or are willing to run Java, you could use xdb_java (and you
don't have to add anything, just make sure whatever Oracle items are present
to access via JDBC).
http://sourceforge.net/projects/xdbjava/
> -Original Message-
> From: Benoit Orihuela [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
OK, cool. I agree that XForms looks heavy but there were some features
that I liked (separation between content and presentation being foremost
in my mind).
Send me the newer JEP or just updated it in CVS so I can post the revised
version. :)
Peter
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Thomas Muldowney wrote:
As I was taking notes at JabberCon, one theme that kept popping into my
mind was the need for strong forms support in Jabber. Just as the World
Wide Web consisted mostly of reading hyperlinked documents (albeit
eventually with some flashy graphics and multimedia stuff) until web
developers figured
For some reason the BlogSpot address doesn't seem to
work. Sorry about that. The document about making a
Humane Jabber interface is now situated at:
http://www.sprinterface.com/humaneinterface.html
Rikard
_
Do You Yahoo!?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - s
AFAIK, the Jabber server itself may not necessarily even know about the IP
of the connecting client (e.g., it may be coming through a firewall).
Certainly this is something that we do not normally expose.
Peter
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Mark Hahn wrote:
>
> I have been building a transport as a stan
> Does it make sense to label the contributions and specifications on
> jabber.org or jabbercentral.org with a statement on their patent policy.
>
> We are doing this at Jabbercentral by marking clients as Open Source or
> Proprietary.
Open-source vs. proprietary does not speak to patented vs. p
> Finally, I don't think this should be part of the security JIG. Security
> and authentication are two different things. Security is about ensuring
Actually, I disagree - in fact, we're having discussions about these very
things on security-jig.
You're right, ONE of the things security is ab
I have been building a transport as a standalone server that accepts
a connection from Jabber. The transport would like to know the IP
addresses of the IM clients that are connecting with Jabber,
registering for and using the services of the transport. Is there any
existing protocol ( perhaps
> > Does Jabber.org have a patent policy on contributions ?
>
> Jabber.org now manages just the XML protocol for jabber. The other kinds
> of "contributions" (let's say, a new IRC Transport or whatever) are code
> created to use Jabber's open XML protocol but they are not part of the
> core of Jab
There were some good responses to the new W3C
patent policy.
The W3C has put out a new reponse
http://www.w3.org/2001/10/patent-response
Oliver Jones wrote:
> W3C is trying to prevent the element of surprise--a submarine patent
surfacing and its owner demanding payment after standardizati
23 matches
Mail list logo
