Hi,
Thanks for the reply Jeremie, I'll be trying it again if the guy who
hosts my domain has time to add the SRV record again (we had problems
with automatic tools so it got removed) :)
>_jabber._tcpIN SRV 30 30 5269 servera.domain.org.
Does any one have any thoughts on a how a client shou
Iain Shigeoka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 1/14/02 7:05 AM, "John Reinke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> For example, if there are two groups of jabber users that work in
>> two separate departments of a company (groups ABC and DEF), I'd
>> like to be able to send a message to ABC or DEF, and
Hi!
I've implemented http proxy support for Gabber with continuous CONNECT, PUT and
POST requests like desribed in http://jabber.org/?oid=2047 and
http://jabber.org/?oid=971.
Are there any more documented or undocumented ways to connect over a http proxy?
Especially something like a non continuou
> I had a SRV record on my domain pointing to my Jabber server but S2S
> only worked with a few other servers (like Jabber.org). I thought that
> was because it was new and not supported by most servers yet, but I
> assume most servers are 1.2+. Could it have been a set up issue and
> what possibl
> Since 1.2, the servers have used the standard SRV dns record type to
> resolve domains into the actual servers that handle jabber. An example
> of such a record for bind for domain.org would look like:
> _jabber._tcpIN SRV 30 30 5269 servera.domain.org.
> The RFC that describes SRV is:
>
Since 1.2, the servers have used the standard SRV dns record type to
resolve domains into the actual servers that handle jabber. An example
of such a record for bind for domain.org would look like:
_jabber._tcpIN SRV 30 30 5269 servera.domain.org.
The RFC that describes SRV is:
http://www.f
Benoit ORIHUELA wrote:
> hi,
>
>
>>Well, then people shouldn't say it's Gabber's fault, it's your patch's
>>fault ;P
>>
> he, yeah, it seems so :)
> or, maybe, it's the fault of Gabber's author who has not yet added support for
> the jcf protocol into its client :) ...
>
I'll accept patches
Hello,
I'm currently attempting to enable my old Jabber server to
interoperate with 1.2+. The old MX record mechanism was working, but
now I seem to be unable to connect to jabber.com. I recall seeing
messages through this list concerning the SRV record, but I am unaware
as to how to find th
On Sat, 2002-01-12 at 05:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If you send many messages or long messages in a short time, AOL servers
> complain and you will get that "Talking too fast" error. AIM-t just passes
> this error through, it does not generate it. The reason the error does not
> show up with o
hi,
> Well, then people shouldn't say it's Gabber's fault, it's your patch's
> fault ;P
he, yeah, it seems so :)
or, maybe, it's the fault of Gabber's author who has not yet added support for
the jcf protocol into its client :) ...
regards,
Benoit.
___
Hello,
since I need to reduce my work for Debian and since Michel already did a lot
of work updating the jabber server packages, I will pass those packages to
him. AFAIK he has already prepared a -ssl and -dev package, so most of your
feature requests should be satisfied with this.
Not sure if h
On 1/12/02 1:33 PM, "Ben Schumacher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 11:28 AM 1/12/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>> Last I heard, they were having trouble with the s2s setup. Primarily the
>> fact that servers doing dialback would try and contact go.com but their IM
>> is running on im.go.com. The in-
On 1/14/02 7:05 AM, "John Reinke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was once told that groups could be created for distributed messaging,
> but I've not found a way to set them up, or a client that appears to
> support them. (I think I found something on the jabber.org web site a
> while ago, but ca
On 9 Jan 2002, Petal wrote:
> Hi, can I run the xdb as a seperate process to the rest of the jabber
> server?
>
> ie, like you can run the transports as seperate processes..
It appears that in all the discussions of "The Important Things", your
message got lost in the shuffle. Yes. It is possibl
I sent this message to the jadmin list last week, but haven't received a
reply so far. I just wanted to verify that this feature exists, and if so,
how to set it up.
-
I was once told that groups could be created for distributed messaging,
but I've not found a way to set them up, or a client th
hi,
> Well, then people shouldn't say it's Gabber's fault, it's your patch's
> fault ;P
he, yeah, it seems so :)
or, maybe, it's the fault of Gabber's author who has not yet added
support for the jcf protocol into its client :) ...
regards,
Benoit.
___
16 matches
Mail list logo
