On 07 Sep 2005, at 15:49, Heiner Wolf wrote:
I am testing my JEP-153 (vCard-Based Avatars) implementation. I
would like to test against as many different cients a s possible
with as many different images and formats as possible. Therefore I
kindly ask people who have a vCard PHOTO to join
Having is enough.
hw
--
Dr. Heiner Wolf
bluehands GmbH Co.mmunication KG
http://www.bluehands.de/people/hw
+49 (0721) 16108 75
--
Jabber enabled Virtual Presence on the Web: www.lluna.de
Open Source Future History: www.galactic-developments.de
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Hi,
is there a client which supports EXTVAL for supplying a URL as vcard PHOTO?
hw
--
Dr. Heiner Wolf
bluehands GmbH Co.mmunication KG
http://www.bluehands.de/people/hw
+49 (0721) 16108 75
--
Jabber enabled Virtual Presence on the Web: www.lluna.de
Open Source Future History:
On Wednesday 07 September 2005 22:57, Zhong Li wrote:
Maybe GTalk can afford that much:).
Maybe... directly in your GMail account.
They might create some sort of WebDAV gateway to allow you to store data
directly in the account.
Mircea
P.S. This might go to my idea of the day list... Hal,
Hi,
The XMPP IM RFC[0] explains how subscriptions and roster integrate.
However, several points are left to the client author's discretion, and
this lead to some confusion. I haven't found any global policy about
this.
[0] http://www.xmpp.org/specs/rfc3921.html#int
First, let's update everyone
This is a problem in a lot of clients.
For example, both tkabber and gajim display
contacts with sub=none or sub=from (see (A)),
and both send presence type=unsubscribe and
type=unsubscribed when the user removes a
contact from roster.
One policy that fixes all the ambiguities (there
Hallo,
following questions are puzzeling me:
does Jabber/XMPP have its own presence model to structure presence
information? If yes, is it extensible?
is the SIP/SIMPLE presence model (person--service--device) used in
Jabber/XMPP?
Thanks a lot best wishes.
Tina
--
5 GB Mailbox, 50
Dnia 08-09-2005, czw o godzinie 15:00 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum napisał(a):
(A) Should a client display contacts with subscription=none or
subscription=from (and not ask=subscribe) ? You obviously don't care
about those contacts, and they will never send you any presence, so
why
lose space in
On 08/09/05 at 18:04 +0200, Dominik Zabłotny wrote:
Dnia 08-09-2005, czw o godzinie 15:00 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum napisał(a):
(A) Should a client display contacts with subscription=none or
subscription=from (and not ask=subscribe) ? You obviously don't care
about those contacts, and they
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
(A) Should a client display contacts with subscription=none or
subscription=from (and not ask=subscribe) ? You obviously don't care
about those contacts, and they will never send you any presence, so why
lose space in your contact list ?
Many clients display from
Ian Paterson wrote:
One policy that fixes all the ambiguities (there are more than you
described) is to only display contacts if the user has given the person
a petname and/or placed them in a group.
And petnames are a good idea for other reasons:
I believe we really need a place save those personal, private stuff. You can put
the idea anywhere you want.
If we put on WebDAV, we have to create another system. Like SOCK proxy, it isn't
in the core of XMPP, but we really need it. If Jabber can have another JEP or
extends JEP-0049(better
FYI, feedback is requested from gateway developers on this spec.
/psa
Original Message
Subject: [Standards-JIG] LAST CALL: JEP-0100 (Gateway Interaction)
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 11:04:40 -0500
From: JEP Editor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jabber protocol discussion list [EMAIL
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005 03:39, Zhong Li wrote:
I believe we really need a place save those personal, private stuff. You
can put the idea anywhere you want.
...we have one.
If we put on WebDAV, we have to create another system. Like SOCK proxy, it
isn't in the core of XMPP, but we really need it.
14 matches
Mail list logo
