Tobias Markmann wrote:
Okay...that would work but in general you only need one JID because the
servers are able to intercommunicate via s2s.
offer both, email notification and XMPP notification. It is also
possible that admins are responsible for multiple server. So Jid
notification makes
If you'll pay the outgoing SMSs, no problem. ;)Technically I could use a jabber2sms gateway like aspsms-t so that isn't really a problem.TobiasOn 9/21/06,
Alexander Gnauck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tobias Markmann wrote: Okay...that would work but in general you only need one JID because the
On 21/09/06 at 08:57 +0200, Tobias Markmann wrote:
If you'll pay the outgoing SMSs, no problem. ;)
Technically I could use a jabber2sms gateway like aspsms-t so that isn't
really a problem.
Email is probably more reliable than relying on third party gateway: I
wouldn't want to lose such
During an active session, is there a way to suspend/resume presence? I am interested in letting the jabber server know that I am currently not interested in receiving presence information - so don't send me information when my buddies status changes. This is for a wireless device, and if I have
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 21/09/06 at 08:57 +0200, Tobias Markmann wrote:
If you'll pay the outgoing SMSs, no problem. ;)
Technically I could use a jabber2sms gateway like aspsms-t so that isn't
really a problem.
Email is probably more reliable than relying on third party gateway: I
On 9/21/06, Saurabh Aggarwal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
During an active session, is there a way to suspend/resume presence? I am
interested in letting the jabber server know that I am currently not
interested in receiving presence information - so don't send me information
when my buddies status
Doesn't this also set my presence to "unavailable". I want to continue staying online (or whatever my statuswas) on my buddies lists, and keep receiving other messages (just not presence from them).
-Saurabh
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:19:04 +0200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: jdev@jabber.org
During an active session, is there a way to suspend/resume
presence? I am interested in letting the jabber server know that I
am currently not interested in receiving presence information - so
don't send me information when my buddies status changes. This is
for a wireless device, and if
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 11:22:12AM +, Saurabh Aggarwal wrote:
Doesn't this also set my presence to unavailable. I want to continue
staying online (or whatever my status was) on my buddies lists, and keep
receiving other messages (just not presence from them).
-Saurabh
hi this is may a stupid question, but what would be the best way you
think to connect
a NON Jabber with a Jabber server,
the goal would be to have interconectivity message exchange maybe also
whiteboarding dident checked the JEPs for that now, the other server has no
message protocoll or better
On 9/21/06, Sascha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so what way would you choose , would you implement server2server
xmpp on the other server?
Yes.
are there any other ways?
You could write a component/transport for the jabber server that talks
to the legacy server. If you 'trust' the jabber
On 9/21/06, Dave Cridland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu Sep 21 12:22:12 2006, Saurabh Aggarwal wrote:
Doesn't this also set my presence to unavailable. I want to
continue staying online (or whatever my status was) on my buddies
lists, and keep receiving other messages (just not presence
Well, we chose to solve this problem with a SOAP Web Service
that maintains state for mobile users and provides an abstracted object model
to the XMPP session. The web service will keep your session to the server
active and queue your contact list changes until you request them. The same
I'm having the idea of adding a feature which tests s2s features of the servers. The monitoring core would try to connect to each server via s2s to check the available features (encryption, etc.).What do you think?
On 9/21/06, Richard Dobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On
2006/9/21, Tobias Markmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm having the idea of adding a feature which tests s2s features of the
servers. The monitoring core would try to connect to each server via s2s to
check the available features (encryption, etc.).
What do you think?
It sounds nice, but I don't
You're right. Monitoring the server availability (uptime, ping delay) should go together with a description of the server components and features(availability of tls, account registration, gateway, user directory, off-line storage...)CédricLe 21 sept. 06 à 21:50, Tobias Markmann a écrit :I'm
16 matches
Mail list logo
