Re: [jdev] Clock system to fallow discussion

2005-09-06 Thread por cherie
Le 5 September 2005, Peter Saint-Andre, � bout, prit son clavier pour taper sur son �cran: Quite a separate issue, yes. But does this person who wants to institute a clock system plan to build a special application to do this, or does he plan to re-use existing clients and hope that they all

Re: [jdev] Clock system to fallow discussion

2005-09-06 Thread por cherie
Le 6 September 2005, Trejkaz, ? bout, prit son clavier pour taper sur son ?cran: Also, GUI-wise it would be a hassle, but I guess users would have to click on the line they're replying to. And most users will be too lazy to do it. This is how clients for tribune work, you have to click

Re: [jdev] Clock system to fallow discussion

2005-09-06 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
Trejkaz wrote: Quoting Peter Saint-Andre [EMAIL PROTECTED]: If clients recognize the message IDs, they could also include an In-Reply-To SHIM header as described in JEP-0131 and include the message ID there. Here's the problem though. Presumably the MUC service, operating as a component,

Re: [jdev] Clock system to fallow discussion

2005-09-05 Thread Alexey Nezhdanov
Monday, 05 Spetember 2005 09:02 Trejkaz wrote: Quoting Alexey Nezhdanov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: There is a feature I would really like to see in jabber, it's a clock system to specify to which message you reply to. This system has been used succesfully for years in tribune like

Re: [jdev] Clock system to fallow discussion

2005-09-05 Thread Trejkaz
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005 22:56, Hal Rottenberg wrote: On 9/5/05, Trejkaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FWIW, it would be better to use message IDs than timestamps. Those demos highlight the problem reasonably well: when you have multiple messages at the same time and someone replies to one message,

Re: [jdev] Clock system to fallow discussion

2005-09-05 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
Hal Rottenberg wrote: On 9/5/05, Trejkaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FWIW, it would be better to use message IDs than timestamps. Those demos highlight the problem reasonably well: when you have multiple messages at the same time and someone replies to one message, you can't tell which message

Re: [jdev] Clock system to fallow discussion

2005-09-05 Thread Trejkaz
Quoting Peter Saint-Andre [EMAIL PROTECTED]: If clients recognize the message IDs, they could also include an In-Reply-To SHIM header as described in JEP-0131 and include the message ID there. Here's the problem though. Presumably the MUC service, operating as a component, has to assign new

[jdev] Clock system to fallow discussion

2005-09-04 Thread por cherie
Hi all, There is a feature I would really like to see in jabber, it's a clock system to specify to which message you reply to. This system has been used succesfully for years in tribune like http://linuxfr.org/board/ (you need to register to post, but you can see how it work without posting) or

Re: [jdev] Clock system to fallow discussion

2005-09-04 Thread Alexey Nezhdanov
Sunday, 04 September 2005 13:40 por cherie wrote: Hi all, There is a feature I would really like to see in jabber, it's a clock system to specify to which message you reply to. This system has been used succesfully for years in tribune like http://linuxfr.org/board/ (you need to register to

Re: [jdev] Clock system to fallow discussion

2005-09-04 Thread Trejkaz
Quoting Alexey Nezhdanov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: There is a feature I would really like to see in jabber, it's a clock system to specify to which message you reply to. This system has been used succesfully for years in tribune like http://linuxfr.org/board/ (you need to register to post, but you can