> On 5/9/07, JD Conley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Last night I put together some guidelines [1] for presence priority
> for
> > desktop XMPP instant messaging applications. Anybody have any
> > comments/suggestions? Oh wait, I mean: I'm right and all current
> > implementations suck.
>
> Yes,
On 5/9/07, JD Conley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Last night I put together some guidelines [1] for presence priority for
desktop XMPP instant messaging applications. Anybody have any
comments/suggestions? Oh wait, I mean: I'm right and all current
implementations suck.
Yes, they're GUIDELINES.
> >>
>
http://www.coversant.net/Coversant/Blogs/tabid/88/EntryID/39/Default.as
> p
> > gives a 404
>
> It's aspx. The 'x' didn't make it on the line and ended up on the next
> one.
Hopefully this one won't wrap:
http://tinyurl.com/2rh4nj
-JD
>> http://www.coversant.net/Coversant/Blogs/tabid/88/EntryID/39/Default.asp
> gives a 404
It's aspx. The 'x' didn't make it on the line and ended up on the next one.
- Sylvain
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 22:24, JD Conley wrote:
> Last night I put together some guidelines [1] for presence priority for
> desktop XMPP instant messaging applications. Anybody have any
> comments/suggestions?
See at the bottom.
> Oh wait, I mean: I'm right and all current
> implementations suck
Last night I put together some guidelines [1] for presence priority for
desktop XMPP instant messaging applications. Anybody have any
comments/suggestions? Oh wait, I mean: I'm right and all current
implementations suck.
-JD
[1]
http://www.coversant.net/Coversant/Blogs/tabid/88/EntryID/39/Defa