On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:23:31AM +0200, Tomasz Sterna wrote:
> 2005/8/30, Rory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > And of course I would also warmly welcome the SRV record for
> > > _xmpp-client._tcp.gmail.com, becouse that would spare me that
> > > explanation, making "things just work".
> > Perhaps you
2005/8/30, Rory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > And of course I would also warmly welcome the SRV record for
> > _xmpp-client._tcp.gmail.com, becouse that would spare me that
> > explanation, making "things just work".
> Perhaps you understand now that there might be a little bit more
> to win here than j
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 11:05:31PM +0200, Tomasz Sterna wrote:
> We are trying to make XMPP accessible to everyone, not the computer geeks
> only.
>
> Please try to explain the whole concept of hosts file, ssh and
> tunneling to Aunt Tillie...
>
> I'd rather like to explain how to click one chec
2005/8/27, Rory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ssh port forwarding but I'll give it a go. I imagine I'd try the
> following steps:
> 1. [...]
We are trying to make XMPP accessible to everyone, not the computer geeks only.
Please try to explain the whole concept of hosts file, ssh and
tunneling to Aunt Ti
On 8/27/05, Trejkaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How about the scenario where you are on a network which blocks all
> > communication to the outside world except ssh ?
>
> That's our work network in a nutshell.
>
> The SSH client does of course have a SOCKS server built-in, but implementing
> S
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 11:15:02AM +1000, Trejkaz wrote:
>
> Yeah. Actually, I used to do this trick before I started using multiple
> servers. I wish the hosts file allowed me to override SRV entries as well as
> A entries. :-)
>
Me too Trejkaz - that would be pretty damn useful!
Rory
On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 07:21, Rory wrote:
> 2. Make the following entry in my hosts file:
>
> 127.0.0.1localhost jabber.org
Yeah. Actually, I used to do this trick before I started using multiple
servers. I wish the hosts file allowed me to override SRV entries as well as
A entries. :-)
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 10:28:41PM +0200, Remko Troncon wrote:
>
> When did this conversation turn into one on HTTP tunneling ? As i
> repeat in every post, all i am talking about is connecting to a
> different XMPP server than the one resolved from the JID. This is
> what the original post
What I'm getting at here is division of labour. I don't think that
an XMPP client should be expected to know how to use HTTP tunneling
When did this conversation turn into one on HTTP tunneling ? As i
repeat in every post, all i am talking about is connecting to a
different XMPP server th
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 08:28:43PM +0200, Remko Troncon wrote:
>
> On 27 Aug 2005, at 19:58, Rory wrote:
>
> >You could run proxies inside firewalls that might be knowledgeable
> >about HTTP tunneling.
>
> You always look at this from the viewpoint of a network
> administrator. If you have n
On 27 Aug 2005, at 19:58, Rory wrote:
You could run proxies inside firewalls that might be knowledgeable
about HTTP tunneling.
You always look at this from the viewpoint of a network
administrator. If you have no control over the network you are in
(i.e. you are not an admin), and the on
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 04:17:37PM +0200, Tijl Houtbeckers wrote:
>
> I doubt it's a 5 minute sysadmin job for Google, with their highly
> distributed network and all. If you can do it in 5 minutes without
> endangering their millions of dollars per hour operations, maybe they
> should hire
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 16:15:26 +0200, Rory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Tijl,
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 03:38:43PM +0200, Tijl Houtbeckers wrote:
Well, since google says in their FAQ that they don't have SRV enabled
*yet* (my emphasis) what's the fuzz about in the first place? :)
What I was re
Hi Tijl,
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 03:38:43PM +0200, Tijl Houtbeckers wrote:
>
> Well, since google says in their FAQ that they don't have SRV enabled
> *yet* (my emphasis) what's the fuzz about in the first place? :)
What I was really asking was that they make this entry
sooner rather than late
On 27 Aug 2005, at 15:38, Tijl Houtbeckers wrote:
Well, since google says in their FAQ that they don't have SRV
enabled *yet* (my emphasis) what's the fuzz about in the first
place? :)
Nu fuss, we just wanted to show that the possibility to set a custom
server in a client is useful, and
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 15:33:49 +0200, Rory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wow, and all this because I didn't think it was too much to ask that
people offering an XMPP service should make a simple DNS SRV entry if
they they wanted to host their service on a machine with a hostname
different from their
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 23:07, Remko Troncon wrote:
> On 27 Aug 2005, at 14:59, Rory wrote:
> > A network scenario like:
>
> How about the scenario where you are on a network which blocks all
> communication to the outside world except ssh ?
That's our work network in a nutshell.
The SSH client does
Hi Remko,
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 03:07:39PM +0200, Remko Troncon wrote:
>
> How about the scenario where you are on a network which blocks all
> communication to the outside world except ssh ?
>
Sounds like a blast!
How about running you client from the remote server on the net - and
have
On 27 Aug 2005, at 14:59, Rory wrote:
A network scenario like:
How about the scenario where you are on a network which blocks all
communication to the outside world except ssh ?
cheers,
Remko
___
jdev mailing list
jdev@jabber.org
http://mail.ja
19 matches
Mail list logo
