Changeset: e17bc65c4784
Author:weijun
Date: 2013-04-11 11:10 +0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/e17bc65c4784
8011745: Unknown CertificateChoices
Reviewed-by: vinnie
! src/share/classes/sun/security/pkcs/PKCS7.java
Changeset: b5494c58ca19
Author:weiju
On 4/15/2013 5:15 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 15/04/2013 09:49, Volker Simonis wrote:
So where is 7u14 beast and why doesn't it become publicly visible?
After all it's a 'feature-release' so there should be no reason to
hide it behind the fences, right?
Regards,
Volker
I think this is just a
Changeset: fe4ada6c96c7
Author:xuelei
Date: 2013-04-15 08:37 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/fe4ada6c96c7
7109274: Restrict the use of certificates with RSA keys less than 1024 bits
Summary: This restriction is applied via the Java Security property,
"
Voting for Vladislav Karnaukhov to JDK7u Committer [1] is now closed.
Yes: 7
Veto: 0
Abstain: 0
According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this is sufficient
to approve the nomination.
alexp
[1]http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk7u-dev/2013-March/006020.html
Changeset: cface35aaf24
Author:ant
Date: 2013-04-15 15:20 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/cface35aaf24
7147075: JTextField doesn't get focus or loses focus forever
Reviewed-by: anthony
! src/solaris/classes/sun/awt/X11/XDecoratedPeer.java
On 15/04/2013 09:49, Volker Simonis wrote:
So where is 7u14 beast and why doesn't it become publicly visible?
After all it's a 'feature-release' so there should be no reason to
hide it behind the fences, right?
Regards,
Volker
I think this is just a numbering thing. The changes accumulating in
Approved.
regards,
Sean.
On 15/04/2013 10:18, Anton V. Tarasov wrote:
Hello,
This is a direct back port from jdk8 to jdk7u.
bug: https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-7147075
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ant/JDK-7147075/webrev.0
jdk8 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/awt/jd
Thanks for the clarification Weijun. Approved.
regards,
Sean.
On 15/04/2013 09:44, Weijun Wang wrote:
Hi Sean
I don't think this is a spec change. There is no such low-level spec
on what kinds of PKCS #9 attribute or CertificateChoices we should
support. The data structures themselves were d
Hello,
This is a direct back port from jdk8 to jdk7u.
bug: https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-7147075
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ant/JDK-7147075/webrev.0
jdk8 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/awt/jdk/rev/dcdf8cd4b09e
tech review:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/
So where is 7u14 beast and why doesn't it become publicly visible?
After all it's a 'feature-release' so there should be no reason to
hide it behind the fences, right?
Regards,
Volker
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Alejandro E Murillo
wrote:
> Requesting approval to integrate hs24-b40 into jd
Hi Sean
I don't think this is a spec change. There is no such low-level spec on
what kinds of PKCS #9 attribute or CertificateChoices we should support.
The data structures themselves were defined long time ago (RFC 2630 on
1999, RFC 2985 on 2000) before JDK 7.
Yes, there will be behavior ch
Weijun,
would you regard this fix as a spec change for an update release ? Do
docs specify what PKI related data types the JDK supports anywhere ? I'm
just wondering if this could introduce an unexpected behavioural change
for some applications. Have all related TCK tests been run ?
regards,
12 matches
Mail list logo
