Looks good to me. I'm glad to see this is finally getting some attention.
Regards,
Mike Swingler
Apple Inc.
On Oct 15, 2012, at 12:53 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
> If you didn't get patch, it's available on openjdk-osx-build SVN :
>
> http://openjdk-osx-build.googlecode.com
t we have a solution that works in the
here and now, an #ifdef is a small price to pay until the next major build
system refactoring occurs.
> I also think this should be taken to JDK8 first.
Of course.
Regards,
Mike Swingler
Apple Inc.
nsupported configuration. Not an easy task.
Regards,
Mike Swingler
Apple Inc.
On May 10, 2012, at 10:17 AM, Julien Ponge wrote:
> Ok, so on pure technical grounds how about the patch that Henri initially
> offered for review?
>
> We are talking here about the "first" step that
e resource for any of us working on OS
>> X, and it would be a terrible shame to lose it.
>
> Unfortunately it seems like it has already been lost...
Let's be clear here. Nothing is lost unless it's unmaintained.
If someone with the necessary skills is willing to commit he
eir proprietary product. The
OpenJDK product should be build-able for 32 or 32/64 Universal by anyone else,
and should accept contributions to it's maintenance, but if nobody is signing
up to keep forward-porting the changes - they don't have a future.
Am I missing something here?
Mike Swingler
Apple Inc.
>
> This bug heavily affects painting of the Java Control Panel application
> which is very visible by the customers
>
> Verified by SQE
>
> Low risk
The change looks fine...but could you provide any screen shots or steps to
reproduce?
Thanks,
Mike Swingler
Apple Inc.
ava.net/census#jdk7u
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects#committer-vote
Mike Swingler
Apple Inc.
posting the webrev to a public location?
Thanks,
Mike Swingler
Apple Inc.
lopers will
want to deploy on OpenJDK 7.
Regards,
Mike Swingler
Apple Inc.
On Feb 27, 2012, at 3:25 PM, Paul Hohensee wrote:
> Imo, it's very unlikely that 64-bit build footprint will ever be an issue, and
> 32-bit build footprint would be an issue on memory-limited devices, of
> which
used to select a build as 32 or 64
> bit.
> So 'ARCH_DATA_MODEL=32' ought to be able to select a 32 bit only build
> without
> too many build changes. Making that support 32+64 as well may be appropriate
> for OS X builds.
>
> -phil.
>
>
>
> On 2/21/2012 3:19
can file a bug and look into this, Mike.
>
> - Jim
>
>
> On 2/21/12 5:55 PM, Mike Swingler wrote:
>> On Feb 21, 2012, at 2:45 PM, James Melvin wrote:
>>
>>> One caveat...
>>>
>>> For the JVM, we've preserved 32/64-bit universal build
there may likely be
> additional work on the JDK side to fully support the same.
That's good to know, but that should really be keyed off of a build flag (which
can default to 64-bit only). Should we file a CR through the Oracle bug
reporter to get the process started to change this for HotSpot?
ository with no public discussion.
I thought the ability to build 32/64 Universal was preserved, and Oracle was
simply going to support 64-bit only in it's proprietary builds.
What is the best path to fixing this?
Mike Swingler
Apple Inc.
good to me. Further discussion over the necessity of a JVMClassPath key
and be handled in a separate enhancement request.
Regards,
Mike Swingler
Apple Inc.
ackage, however
now that 10.7.3 is shipped to customers, we would like to get the current
headers into the 10.7 SDK which is shipped with Xcode. After that, OpenJDK 7
should be able to bootstrap itself on a clean 10.7.3 machine, with no Apple
Java installed.
Exciting times,
Mike Swingler
Apple
rements to 10.7.3, since it contains an
updated version of the JavaRuntimeSupport.framework, which contains all the new
API OpenJDK 7 requires. You no longer have to download the "Java for Mac OS X
10.7 Update 1" package from Apple to run the OpenJDK 7 binaries with full
platform fidelity.
Cheers,
Mike Swingler
Apple Inc.
/7131793/webrev.2
>>>
>>> Technical review:
>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/macosx-port-dev/2012-January/002537.html
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Dmitry
I believe local refs are collected after the scope of the local function
returns, so I don't believe it's strictly necessary.
Is that right?
Regards,
Mike Swingler
Apple Inc.
On Jan 13, 2012, at 10:52 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> 13.01.2012 21:31, Mike Swingler пишет:
>> On Jan 13, 2012, at 6:27 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>>
>>> 13.01.2012 6:30, Mike Swingler wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Jan 12, 2012, at 4:24 AM, Sergey Bylok
Does someone here know of the best contact for someone who works on the wiki?
There are no links to a maintainer of <http://wikis.oracle.com> or other
support staff for the OTN. I think the wiki is of questionable value if the
community can't contribute content to it.
Regards,
Mi
After consenting to the terms and conditions, are you able to make any edits to
the page content, or only comment?
Regards,
Mike Swingler
Apple Inc.
On Jan 11, 2012, at 5:28 PM, John Yeary wrote:
> Hello Mike,
>
> I can log in, but it did prompt me with terms and conditions which i
On Jan 16, 2012, at 8:24 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> The fix has been reviewed on macosx-port-dev mailing list and approved
> by Kevin Miller (kmiller), Mike Swingler (?), and Alexander Zuev
> (kizune). (Sorry but I don't have Mike's id.) -Pete
My id is either "swing
On Jan 13, 2012, at 6:27 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> 13.01.2012 6:30, Mike Swingler wrote:
>
>> On Jan 12, 2012, at 4:24 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> This is a request to push the following changes to jdk7u-osx.
>>> The fix has bee
ne of those named levels.
Please do not integrate this fix as is,
Mike Swingler
Apple Inc.
[NSColor
controlBackgroundColor];
Why aren't you just using [NSColor windowBackgroundColor]?
Regards,
Mike Swingler
Apple Inc.
I did end up re-registering under a different identity, but now I can't edit
anything (probably a time restriction to avoid spam bots).
Ugh,
Mike Swingler
Apple Inc.
On Jan 11, 2012, at 5:25 PM, Scott Kovatch wrote:
> I just logged in with my Oracle ID. Today was also the first day
Can anyone else log into the wiki
<https://wikis.oracle.com/display/OpenJDK/Mac+OS+X+Port>?
Seems to be immediately signing me out as soon as I log in.
There are no apparent links on the site or on the other OTN pages to report
issues with the site.
Any suggestions?
Mike Swingler
Apple Inc.
y property storage so the next call won't attempt
> to free a bad pointer.
>
> Thanks,
> Scott K.
I approve: looks like good hygiene to NULL those out.
Cheers,
Mike Swingler
Apple Inc.
o me, but you should also note the version of Xcode you
used to edit the project file. You will need a bug ID for this to be integrated.
Regards,
Mike Swingler
Apple Inc.
Great news. Thanks much for your help Nelson.
Cheers,
Mike Swingler
Apple Inc.
On Jan 9, 2012, at 11:40 PM, nelson.dco...@oracle.com wrote:
> Mike,
>
> I have deployed the changes to accept reports through bugreport.sun.com for
> bugs reported against the Mac OS X platform. These
y attempt to file a bug against
Mac OS X.
Ideas?
Mike Swingler
Apple Inc.
On Jan 4, 2012, at 1:53 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2012, at 11:18 AM, Mike Swingler wrote:
>
>> On Jan 4, 2012, at 11:12 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry. I thought we were talking about the pages at:
>>> http://openjdk.java.net/pr
le.com/display/OpenJDK/Mac+OS+X+Port
Anyone can edit those pages…it's an open wiki, you just have to sign up with a
different account than your Oracle internal one.
> I can add to or edit the http://openjdk.java.net/ pages if needed.
>
> -kto
Thanks,
Mike Swingler
Apple Inc.
Sure thing. I just thought that someone else should take ownership of some the
content (or replace it with links to more official pages), since I'm not always
going to be the right person with the right answers as the port mainlines.
Thanks much,
Mike Swingler
Apple Inc.
On Jan 3, 2012,
sx-port repo.
Thanks,
Mike Swingler
Apple Inc.
b
What's up with the magic "576" number in
test/java/net/DatagramSocket/Send12k.java?
Also, for OS checks, we always use the form:
if(System.getProperty("os.name").startsWith("Mac"))
Just curious,
Mike Swingler
Apple Inc.
On Dec 20, 2011, at 11:43 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> On Dec 20, 2011, at 11:34 AM, Mike Swingler wrote:
>
>> Is there an existing Bugster ID for moving the JDK8 build to clang on the
>> Mac (obviously blocked on the introduction of the Mac port to JDK8)?
>
> 7123056
On Dec 20, 2011, at 9:50 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> On Dec 20, 2011, at 9:38 AM, Mike Swingler wrote:
>
>> On Dec 20, 2011, at 8:43 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>>
>>> On Dec 19, 2011, at 11:39 PM, Alex Strange wrote:
>>>
>>>>> If yo
and testing matrix, and keeps everyone moving towards
the goal instead of rat-holing on corner cases you only hit on legacy systems.
I for one, welcome any opportunity to accelerate the development process of the
macosx-port,
Mike Swingler
Apple Inc.
JDK
>>> (right Alex? I'm not completely hallucinating this right?)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Mike Swingler
>>> Apple Inc.
>> Clang works fine to compile jdk. However, the build for hotspot is very
>> unclean and prints thousands of warnings, beca
On Dec 19, 2011, at 4:38 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> On Dec 19, 2011, at 4:11 PM, Mike Swingler wrote:
>
>> On Dec 19, 2011, at 3:33 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Need reviewer for some sanity check fixes for jdk7u-osx (Mac)
>>&g
to using clang soon, since it has no known bugs compiling the JDK (right
Alex? I'm not completely hallucinating this right?)
Regards,
Mike Swingler
Apple Inc.
41 matches
Mail list logo
