On 12/2/11 10:53 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 01/12/2011 21:38, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>> :
>> There is no special procedure for pushing into jdk7u-osx that's different
>> from
>> the one for jdk7u-dev. You need to submit a bulk change request for approval
>> first,
>> someone (i.e. either me or Ed
On 02/12/11 10:21, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 02/12/2011 10:13, Weijun Wang wrote:
Yes, I think jdk7u-osx is only a temporary playground. There is no
need for approval to push anything there.
In fact, it's even not as formal as jdk8/tl, where code reviews must
be done seriously, jcheck rules must
On 02/12/2011 10:13, Weijun Wang wrote:
Yes, I think jdk7u-osx is only a temporary playground. There is no
need for approval to push anything there.
In fact, it's even not as formal as jdk8/tl, where code reviews must
be done seriously, jcheck rules must be obeyed, and all changesets
will be
Yes, I think jdk7u-osx is only a temporary playground. There is no need
for approval to push anything there.
In fact, it's even not as formal as jdk8/tl, where code reviews must be
done seriously, jcheck rules must be obeyed, and all changesets will be
pushed to the main repo with no change. T
On 01/12/2011 21:38, Dalibor Topic wrote:
:
There is no special procedure for pushing into jdk7u-osx that's different from
the one for jdk7u-dev. You need to submit a bulk change request for approval
first,
someone (i.e. either me or Edvard) needs to approve it, then the push can happen
- regard
On 02/12/2011 02:03, David Holmes wrote:
:
My concern is that there are a number of platform specific changes
being made to java.* and javax.* classes (there are changes to sun.*
as well but that is less of a concern).
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/7113349/4/jdk7u-osx/modified/
I woul
>> Where is the Mercurial URL for jdk7u-osx ?
>
>
> Same place as all the other repos :)
>
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-osx/
Nice, I'll try to build this one also :)
Cheers
On 2/12/2011 4:56 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Where is the Mercurial URL for jdk7u-osx ?
Same place as all the other repos :)
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-osx/
David
2011/12/2 David Holmes:
On 2/12/2011 11:30 AM, Paul Hohensee wrote:
I agree. Be a good idea to ask for review from
Where is the Mercurial URL for jdk7u-osx ?
2011/12/2 David Holmes :
>
>
>
> On 2/12/2011 11:30 AM, Paul Hohensee wrote:
>>
>> I agree. Be a good idea to ask for review from all the affected teams.
>> I _think_ core libs is the only one we missed, though.
>
>
> My concern is that there are a numbe
On 2/12/2011 11:30 AM, Paul Hohensee wrote:
I agree. Be a good idea to ask for review from all the affected teams.
I _think_ core libs is the only one we missed, though.
My concern is that there are a number of platform specific changes being
made to java.* and javax.* classes (there are cha
I agree. Be a good idea to ask for review from all the affected teams.
I _think_ core libs is the only one we missed, though.
Paul
On 12/1/11 8:07 PM, David Holmes wrote:
On 2/12/2011 7:38 AM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
On 12/1/11 6:12 PM, Michael McMahon wrote:
Kelly,
Yes, that is correct. This p
On 2/12/2011 7:38 AM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
On 12/1/11 6:12 PM, Michael McMahon wrote:
Kelly,
Yes, that is correct. This push is initially just for jdk7u-osx, which
is a development forest. I'm not sure exactly what the procedure will be yet
for the push into jdk7u-dev.
There is no special pro
On 12/1/11 6:12 PM, Michael McMahon wrote:
> Kelly,
>
> Yes, that is correct. This push is initially just for jdk7u-osx, which
> is a development forest. I'm not sure exactly what the procedure will be yet
> for the push into jdk7u-dev.
There is no special procedure for pushing into jdk7u-osx tha
On 12/1/11 5:07 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> I haven't been watching the rules closely, but doesn't someone have to get
> some kind of jdk7 update
> approval before pushing anything into jdk7u-dev?
> And if so, would someone be doing some kind of one big approval for a massive
> integration from
> j
14 matches
Mail list logo
