Not from me too. I'm VERY busy in my FULL time job. I will come back
later this week.
Erik Bengtson
-Original Message-
From: Andy Jefferson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 8:31 PM
To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: Re: Problem with self-referencing
Hi,
I discussed the inheritance proposal with Michael today and we came up
with a couple of questions I added below.
The following table describes the inheritance strategy setting for each
class for the 5 inheritance mappings. I abbreviated the inheritance
strategies: new - new-table, super
For the benefit of anyone developing the TCK and thinking about using the
latest API20 (with yesterdays changes) when running with JPOX : It won't work
with current latest build of JPOX (so stick to your existing
jdo2-api-2.0-SNAPSHOT.jar)
JPOX CVS has now been updated and the next nightly
Hi Michael(s),
Not fully read your proposal, so can't comment on the rest ...
- Does JDO require a inheritance element for classes in an inheritance
hierarchy? If not, is there a default? The same questions apply to the
strategy attribute inside of the inheritance element.
You don't need to
Hi,
[...]
I heard you mentioning on the conference call that i
could run an individual test in maven, could you please tell me how to do
that?
It depends on which project you're running. The TCK can run a single
configuration (combination of database, test data, and test program. In
the
Hi Andy,
Hi Michael(s),
Not fully read your proposal, so can't comment on the rest ...
- Does JDO require a inheritance element for classes in an inheritance
hierarchy? If not, is there a default? The same questions apply to the
strategy attribute inside of the inheritance element.
You
Hi Andy,
I can run companyNoRelationships.conf several times without
reinstalling the schema. The result is always the same:
SQL Exception: Column name
'DATASTOREIDENTITY0.PERSONS.DATASTORE_IDENTITY' is in more than one
table in the FROM list.
This is JDO-93. I cannot reproduce JDO-116.
Suppose there are two non-abstract persistence-capable classes A and B.
Class B extends A. Both explicitly define the inheritance strategy
new-table. Class A maps to table TA and B maps to table TB. Then there
are still two scenarios possible, depending on where to store the
inherited fields
I can run companyNoRelationships.conf several times without
reinstalling the schema. The result is always the same:
Hi Michael,
I get the same as you, today! but certainly didn't yesterday. Since I can't
reproduce it myself now, someone please just close the issue (JIRA-116) and
if I find
Hi Andy,
thanks for the info! You are right, I forgot that I have the add field
elements for the inherited fields.
Regards Michael
Suppose there are two non-abstract persistence-capable classes A and B.
Class B extends A. Both explicitly define the inheritance strategy
new-table. Class A
Hi,
I changed the antlr dependency to version 2.7.5, because this version is
available on ibiblio. So there is no need anymore to manually copy the
antlr jar to the local maven repository.
Regards Michael
Hi Brian, hi Craig,
as Craig pointed out, we had a non-standard way to support
Minor point, but I would suggest doing it in setUp() for a couple
reasons:
* You know datastore is in good state before test runs instead of after
* You can examine datastore state afterwards to double check things
manually
* If things go wrong during the test, the evidence isn't erased
On
12 matches
Mail list logo