[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-414?page=comments#action_12449799 ]
Michelle Caisse commented on JDO-414:
-
I agree that we should simple delete the call to
primaryObj.addChild(secondaryObj). It doesn't appear to be necessary.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-414?page=comments#action_12449821 ]
Craig Russell commented on JDO-414:
---
If you skip the call to primaryObj.addChild(secondaryObj), you have to make
primaryObj dirty in some other way, or you are not
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-414?page=comments#action_12449826 ]
Michelle Caisse commented on JDO-414:
-
Oops. What I meant was to skip the call to ternaryObj.addChild(secondaryObj)
in the following code snippet:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-414?page=comments#action_12449851 ]
Craig Russell commented on JDO-414:
---
Ok, sounds good.
CallingJdoPreclear tries to add the same instance to multiple 1-M relations
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-414?page=all ]
Michelle Caisse resolved JDO-414.
-
Fix Version/s: JDO 2 maintenance release 1
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed with revision: 475051
CallingJdoPreclear tries to add the same instance to
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-443?page=all ]
Michelle Caisse resolved JDO-443.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed with revision: 475055
Change column name in InstanceCallbacks table
-
Wow, fixed the 80 character lines, too.
Craig
On Nov 14, 2006, at 3:28 PM, Michelle Caisse (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-443?page=all ]
Michelle Caisse resolved JDO-443.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed with revision: 475055
