Hi Andy,Thanks, cleared it up for me.CraigOn Dec 30, 2005, at 12:01 AM, Andy Jefferson wrote:Hi Craig, I'm afraid I'm confused. I looked at the referenced JPOX issue and itappears to be resolved.What does that mean for this issue? JPOX has its own issue tracker. We raise issues on ourselves, as do
Hi Craig,
> I'm afraid I'm confused. I looked at the referenced JPOX issue and it
> appears to be resolved.
>
> What does that mean for this issue?
JPOX has its own issue tracker. We raise issues on ourselves, as do our users,
just like any project. I had an issue already in JPOX JIRA that was t
Hi Andy,I'm afraid I'm confused. I looked at the referenced JPOX issue and it appears to be resolved.What does that mean for this issue?Thanks,CraigOn Dec 16, 2005, at 11:16 PM, Andy Jefferson (JIRA) wrote: [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-256?page=comments#action_12360653 ] Andy Jeffe
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-256?page=comments#action_12360653 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-256:
Please refer to http://www.jpox.org/servlet/jira/browse/CORE-2610 for details.
No point us duplicating details across 2 JIRA systems.
>
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-256?page=comments#action_12360316 ]
Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-256:
--
Both xml files companyNoRelationships and companyAllRelationships define the
same pc instances, but companyNoRelationships does not s
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-256?page=comments#action_12360294 ]
Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-256:
Any chance of a clue as to what "data has changed" ? Something to do with
medical and dental insurance ? Wading through this object model
