Hi,
We will have our regular meeting Friday, July 14 at 9 am PST to discuss
JDO TCK issues and status.
Dial-in numbers are:
866 230-6968 294-0479#
International: +1 865 544-7856
Agenda:
1. JDO2 Annotations: 1, 2, or 3 (any and all)
2. Deletion of objects when foreign-key is present (JDO-3
Attendees: Michelle Caisse, Matthew Adams, Michael Bouschen, Kristian
Ernst, Erik Bengtson, Craig Russell
Agenda:
1. JDO2 Annotations: 1, 2, or 3 (any and all) Technically, we might
be better off having JDO annotations. But since 220 has already
defined annotations, it might be better to u
Hello Craig,
if I understand things right, you changed your mind and now you don't
see a any problem with JPOX's automatic nulling out of FKs? If that's
the case, then I wonder why a user would want to have FK constraints in
his schema at all? They wouldn't be of much use then.
I may also ad
Hi Jörg,On Jul 17, 2006, at 9:26 AM, Jörg von Frantzius wrote: Hello Craig, if I understand things right, you changed your mind and now you don't see a any problem with JPOX's automatic nulling out of FKs? Yes, I have changed my mind on this issue.If that's the case, then I wonder why a user would
Craig L Russell schrieb:
If that's the case, then I wonder why a user
would want to have FK constraints in his schema at all? They wouldn't
be of much use then.
If only using JDO, I agree. What matters is the consistency of the
object model, which is managed by the JDO implementati
Hi Jörg,On Jul 17, 2006, at 10:27 AM, Jörg von Frantzius wrote: Craig L Russell schrieb: If that's the case, then I wonder why a user would want to have FK constraints in his schema at all? They wouldn't be of much use then.If only using JDO, I agree. What matters is the consistency of th
--- Jörg von Frantzius
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To me this means losing an important data security
> feature when using
> JDO over other access paths to the DB. FK
> constraints can prevent you
> from inadvertently deleting data, and by silently
> removing any dangling
> references on the
Hi Craig,
Craig L Russell schrieb:
Hi Jörg,
On Jul 17, 2006, at 10:27 AM, Jörg von Frantzius wrote:
Craig L Russell schrieb:
If that's the case, then I wonder why a
user would want to have FK constraints in his schema at all? They
wouldn't be of much use
Hi Craig, Joerg,
I agree that FK constraints are an important and powerful feature of
relational databases. They provide for referential integrity, and, as a
side effect, prevent people/applications from deleting rows unless FKs
are nullified first.
My impression is that below you are talkin
