This is great! I'm also making progress on annotations tests and will
probably have something to check in early next week so it would be cool
if we could branch tck20 soon.
-- Michelle
Michael Bouschen wrote:
Hi Andy, hi Craig,
I ran the TCK with JDO metatdata files referring the 2.1 XSD a
Cool.
Craig
On Jun 15, 2007, at 2:28 PM, Michael Bouschen wrote:
Hi Andy, hi Craig,
I ran the TCK with JDO metatdata files referring the 2.1 XSD
against the latest JPOX and it works great!
I will file a JIRA issue for chaning the metadata files and attach
a patch.
Regards Michael
On
Hi Andy, hi Craig,
I ran the TCK with JDO metatdata files referring the 2.1 XSD against the
latest JPOX and it works great!
I will file a JIRA issue for chaning the metadata files and attach a patch.
Regards Michael
On Jun 15, 2007, at 10:33 AM, Andy Jefferson wrote:
3. Update TCK to use
> The errors that I see now are related to changing boolean to String in
> the annotations classes. Presumably this will be fixed in an upcoming
> build of jpox and I can proceed with the test development.
All handling changes for boolean/String were made earlier today and I've just
run the nigh
Andy Jefferson wrote:
PS. Any JDO2.1 TCK will, at some point, need jpox-java5-1.2-SNAPSHOT.jar
including in its project.xml. This JPOX jar was previously (til last night)
including the JDO2.1 annotations in the jar, but I've now stripped them out
to use those in the jdo2-api-SNAPSHOT.jar so th
Craig L Russell wrote:
Attendees: Matthew Adams, Michelle Caisse, Michael Bouschen, Martin
Zaun, Craig Russell
1. Annotations update Annotations were checked in to the api2
project. Michelle is trying to get JPOX enhancer to work with
annotations instead of using .jdo and .orm metadata fi
Hi Andy,
On Jun 15, 2007, at 11:20 AM, Andy Jefferson wrote:
Hi Craig,
Looks like this will be available for testing this weekend (once the
HEAD gets pushed out). Right?
HEAD (and RELEASE_1_1) is built every night at approx 01:00 GMT, so
yes.
PS. Any JDO2.1 TCK will, at some point, need
Hi Craig,
> Looks like this will be available for testing this weekend (once the
> HEAD gets pushed out). Right?
HEAD (and RELEASE_1_1) is built every night at approx 01:00 GMT, so yes.
PS. Any JDO2.1 TCK will, at some point, need jpox-java5-1.2-SNAPSHOT.jar
including in its project.xml. This J
On Jun 15, 2007, at 10:33 AM, Andy Jefferson wrote:
3. Update TCK to use 2.1 xsd: Enhancer has a problem with 2.1 xsd
definition. AI Michael file a blocker JIRA to get the JPOX fixed.
You mean this ?
http://www.jpox.org/servlet/jira/browse/CORE-3300
Looks like this will be available for tes
> 3. Update TCK to use 2.1 xsd: Enhancer has a problem with 2.1 xsd
> definition. AI Michael file a blocker JIRA to get the JPOX fixed.
You mean this ?
http://www.jpox.org/servlet/jira/browse/CORE-3300
--
Andy (Java Persistent Objects - http://www.jpox.org)
Attendees: Matthew Adams, Michelle Caisse, Michael Bouschen, Martin
Zaun, Craig Russell
1. Annotations update Annotations were checked in to the api2
project. Michelle is trying to get JPOX enhancer to work with
annotations instead of using .jdo and .orm metadata files.
What about definin
Hi,
We will have our regular meeting Friday, June 15 at 9 am PDT to discuss
JDO TCK issues and status.
Dial-in numbers are:
866 230-6968 294-0479#
International: +1 865 544-7856
Agenda:
1. Annotations update
2. Feedback on JDO 2.1 draft spec
3. Update TCK to use 2.1 xsd
4. Other issues
Ac
12 matches
Mail list logo
