+Jenkins Dev to the communication.
Hi All,
A brief update on this matter. We are continuing to work on this - we are
are working with meetup.com and CDF to re-instate the deleted JAMs and will
provide follow up communications with the affected JAMs accordingly.
With the transition of JAMs to
Hi,
For historical reasons, Jenkins has still shipped with old, deprecated
protocols, JNLP1-connect, JNLP2-connect, and JNLP3-connect. These are
also known currently as Inbound TCP Agent Protocol/1, Inbound TCP Agent
Protocol/2, and Inbound TCP Agent Protocol/3. These all have fundamental
Quick update: I have created the draft PR with its corresponding JIRA task (
https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/4425)
On Friday, January 10, 2020 at 11:52:20 AM UTC+1, Oleg Nenashev wrote:
>
> +100 for switching from Jenkins JS Builder to a standard Webpack.
> According to experiments
https://github.com/cdfoundation/foundation/issues/127
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 1:58 PM Baptiste Mathus
wrote:
> I think a strong concern as it is right now is that CDF's Slack is still
> on the free plan.
>
> I am going to ask around what are the plan and any ETA for this to be
> either
I think a strong concern as it is right now is that CDF's Slack is still on
the free plan.
I am going to ask around what are the plan and any ETA for this to be
either approved, or rejected.
I would not like us to work on the UX/UI refresh, but see older messages
become inaccessible in a few
I'd guess any plugin maintainer can just proceed and add CODEOWNERS to the
repo.
There is no need to wait for the bot if you want to start adopting the
suggestion :)
On Thursday, January 9, 2020 at 7:07:08 PM UTC+1, Gavin Mogan wrote:
>
> Sweet I was going to suggest the same thing..
>
> Lots
+100. Thanks to Alex, Gavin and many other folks who help contributors in
the Jenkins channels!
On Friday, January 10, 2020 at 2:40:04 AM UTC+1, slide wrote:
>
> Marky,
>
> Thanks for always having such a positive attitude! It's very contagious!
> This community it a great one, people helping
+100 for switching from Jenkins JS Builder to a standard Webpack. According
to experiments with jsbuilder it is pretty difficult to use this tool,
especially for those ones who are not Javascript experts. Webpack is at
least a standard tool, so it will be more convenient for newcomer
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 5:59 PM Daniel Anechitoaie
wrote:
> Awesome. So there are two options, this one with AsyncPeriodicWorker and
> the one from @Jeff where you can run it after each job.
> I'll look into seeing which one fits best for the current use case.
>
Possibly both, depending on what
I'll file the draft PR then.
I already had in mind those TODOs that you mentioned. I wanted to get them
done before filing the PR.
On Thursday, January 9, 2020 at 8:18:31 PM UTC+1, Jesse Glick wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 1:10 PM Felix Queiruga > wrote:
> > The branch can be found at
>
Would it be possible to transfer
https://github.com/jenkinsci/jep/blob/master/jep/10/README.adoc to Accepted
since we effectively use it now?
It requires an approval from Tyler as a BDFL delegate
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 10:27 PM Mark Waite
wrote:
> I've received also
>
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2020,
11 matches
Mail list logo
