I see no problem with switching the Weekly release line in February with
the new LTS baseline release. I also agree with Baptiste that a 3-month
notice for deprecation is too short. I suggest announcing the September LTS
as a target for complete Java 8 support removal in the LTS baseline. The
I like the planning idea, I think updating the minimum in Feb 2021 for
weeklies and hence June for LTS is a bit too aggressive.
I think we should *at least* target the LTS _after_ June.
And in the meantime keep communicating on this timeline like we had done
for Java 8.
Blogs. Tweet encouraging
Maybe you can inline the existing Abstract form the JEP before the section
‚Prerequisites‘? And add an example that shows the old and new versions in the
abstract as well?
> Am 28.12.2021 um 14:58 schrieb 'Jesse Glick' via Jenkins Developers
> :
>
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 5:50 AM Marit M
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 5:50 AM Marit M wrote:
> now I understand that Incrementals appends a commit number, plus a SHA, to
> version numbers.
>
https://www.jenkins.io/doc/developer/publishing/releasing-cd/#pom-file-modifications
says so; is there a way we could make this more prominent?
--
Sorry for the confusion, now I understand that Incrementals appends a
commit number, plus a SHA, to version numbers.
I'll stick with this versioning format and revert my changes.
Thanks,
Marit.
ב-יום שני, 27 בדצמבר 2021 בשעה 20:13:57 UTC+2, ga...@gavinmogan.com כתב/ה:
> I'll admit, I'm still
