Re: Circular dependencies in plugins

On 11/06/17 13:46, Daniel Beck wrote: >> But the instance which concerns me at the moment says Token Macro >> Plugin is dependent on Pipeline. > > token-macro 2.2 had the dependency, it was dropped in 2.3. Which are > the versions you're using. Thank you. I was using 2.2. I had deferred updates

Re: Circular dependencies in plugins

On 11/03/17 18:27, Stephen Connolly wrote: >> Every one of the Pipeline plugins, all 23 of them, claim to be dependent >> on some other plugins. None offer the option to disable. The chain seems >> endless. And many of the plugins asserted to be dependent are ones I want >> to keep, such as

Re: Circular dependencies in plugins

On 11/04/17 05:08, Daniel Beck wrote: >> Look for the list entry just called 'Pipeline' (or search for >> pipeline-aggregator in the search box). > Oops -- used to be called workflow, so workflow-aggregator. >> Try to disable it. If the checkbox is disabled and you cannot, file >> a bug against

Re: Circular dependencies in plugins

On 11/03/17 03:05, Daniel Beck wrote: > If you're not using Declarative (or even Pipeline), I'd start > disabling things there. (On the plugins manager UI, disabling plugins > enables checkboxes of plugins that can then be disabled because > nothing else depends on them, etc. -- much easier than

Re: Circular dependencies in plugins

Daniel Beck wrote: > Without a list of plugins (and versions) on the other instance it's > impossible to say why might these differ. Ok. Here's another instance with 73 plugins listed below. Again, the Graphviz dot file is attached. Ant Plugin 1.2 Apache HttpComponents Client 4.x API Plugin

Circular dependencies in plugins

I have a Jenkins server (2.87) with quite a few plugins installed. 95, actually. I don't actually need some of them and I like to clean things up a bit. But that doesn't seem practical. Here's the list of installed plugins. Ant Plugin 1.7 Audit Trail 2.2 Authentication Tokens API Plugin 1.3

Multijob plugin

Is it possible that I'm the only one in the world using this plugin? I ask because I've asked questions here with no response at all. I've also sent the same questions to those listed as maintainers on the plugin's wiki page with no response. The wiki page seems to say there are about 16,000

Multijob plugin

I really like the Multijob plugin (), though I see there is some encouragement to move to the Pipelines conglomeration. For my purposes, Multijob is more straight-forward and presents clear results. It includes a potentially very

Re: Build flow job gets indecipherable Groovy error

I wrote: I have a Jenkins job using the build flow plugin. A portion of it looks like the code below. parallel ( { ignore ( FAILURE ) { build ( job1, BRANCH: params [ BRANCH ] ) } }, { ignore ( FAILURE ) { build ( job2, BRANCH: params [ BRANCH ] ) } } ) I'd like to replace the

Build flow job gets indecipherable Groovy error

I have a Jenkins job using the build flow plugin. A portion of it looks like the code below. parallel ( { ignore ( FAILURE ) { build ( job1, BRANCH: params [ BRANCH ] ) } }, { ignore ( FAILURE ) { build ( job2, BRANCH: params [ BRANCH ] ) } } ) I'd like to replace the BRANCH parameter

Re: Keeping build information (not artifacts)

I wrote: Something is deleting old build information from my Jenkins (version 1.556 running on Fedora) jobs directory. This doesn't seem to be based on any apparent criteria like the number of old builds, the age of the builds, or anything else. Some jobs show all their history; others have

Keeping build information (not artifacts)

Something is deleting old build information from my Jenkins (version 1.556 running on Fedora) jobs directory. This doesn't seem to be based on any apparent criteria like the number of old builds, the age of the builds, or anything else. Some jobs show all their history; others have only a few

Re: Avoiding an unnecessary build entirely

On 2013-11-19, I wrote: Using the Build Flow plugin, I have a master job containing a sequence of steps invoking other, ordinary jobs. The order of the ordinary build jobs is important, sometimes because of job dependencies but sometimes only to avoid possible conflicts. In the latter case,

Avoiding an unnecessary build entirely

Using the Build Flow plugin, I have a master job containing a sequence of steps invoking other, ordinary jobs. The order of the ordinary build jobs is important, sometimes because of job dependencies but sometimes only to avoid possible conflicts. In the latter case, it may not be useful to

RE: Sharing my views

] Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2013 11:33 PM Pacific Standard Time To: jenkinsci-users@googlegroups.com Subject:Re: Sharing my views Create your views from the main page not My Views and I think you should get what you are after. Richard. On Sunday, November 17, 2013, CLOSE Dave

RE: Sharing my views

Subject:Re: Sharing my views All views you have created so far are public views. Anyone will see them. Vincent 2013/11/15 CLOSE Dave dave.cl...@us.thalesgroup.com I'm a bit confused by the view mechanism in Jenkins. I have created several additional views for my own

Sharing my views

I'm a bit confused by the view mechanism in Jenkins. I have created several additional views for my own use using the + on the tab bar. When I click My views on the left menu, only the default view is shown. Yet every time I connect, I see all the tabs I saw the previous time. I know that I

Last failed build not updated

I recently updated to 1.535 on Linux x86_64. A job which failed yesterday now shows a red icon (as it should) but the last failure column shows 1 mo 3 days whereas the last success column shows 1 day 16 hr. Those dates imply that the most recent build was successful, which it wasn't. What am I

Re: Last failed build not updated

I wrote: I recently updated to 1.535 on Linux x86_64. A job which failed yesterday now shows a red icon (as it should) but the last failure column shows 1 mo 3 days whereas the last success column shows 1 day 16 hr. Those dates imply that the most recent build was successful, which it wasn't.

Proxy port

Somehow I've managed to get my Jenkins system's proxy configuration screwed up and I can't find how to get it back again. This affects Buckminster. When I run a Buckminster job, it fails and the log contains these lines: !ENTRY org.eclipse.core.net 1 0 2013-05-23 18:04:35.729 !MESSAGE System

Re: AW: Proxy authentication

I asked: Searching around on the Net, I find many people who have had trouble getting a headless Eclipse/Buckminster build to work when the builder is located behind a proxy that requires authentication. But I haven't found any real solutions. I'd really like to see a step-by-step guide.

Proxy authentication

Searching around on the Net, I find many people who have had trouble getting a headless Eclipse/Buckminster build to work when the builder is located behind a proxy that requires authentication. But I haven't found any real solutions. I'd really like to see a step-by-step guide. Most