Thanks John, that sounds like a good idea. I'll see what I can do by
way of archiving artifacts. So far, I had been thinking of artifacts
in term of pure build output (files, libraries, whatever), not as
metadata.
On 23 Feb., 23:56, John Vacz
wrote:
> On 23.02.2012 08:36, Sas
Hi there,
I'd like to set up two dependent build projects for the same software
product as follows:
- have a "quick" build run every time a developer commits changes,
i.e. using the SCM polling trigger. This will only be an incremental
build, followed by unit tests.
- run a scheduled full "nightly
