Re: Experiences with LTS vs Bleeding edge

2013-12-10 Thread teilo
Issues won't get fixed as quickly as they need to be in a release for two weeks first. That said you are less likely to discover new issues - with the exception of a new major lts version, however that has an amount of testing which latest never has. If you are really concerned with bugs

Re: Experiences with LTS vs Bleeding edge

2013-12-10 Thread Maciej Jaros
Probably the best approach is to use LTS, but wait a few weeks - just to check if there are any bugs discovered (you can check community ratings in changelog http://jenkins-ci.org/changelog-stable). Also backup before update, and after update check if most crucial functions are stable (do some

Experiences with LTS vs Bleeding edge

2013-12-09 Thread Klaus Schniedergers
Hi, we've been so far always using more recent Jenkins versions, but are experiencing enough issues after each upgrade (especially with plugins) that we're thinking about using LTS instead. But on the other hand I'm worried that issues get fixed faster and get more visibility if they're in the

Re: Experiences with LTS vs Bleeding edge

2013-12-09 Thread Slide
Just from one plugin developer, I set my plugin up to build against the latest LTS version, NOT the latest version of Jenkins. This means that there have been times when changes in core have broken people who are using my plugin with more recent versions. I prefer to keep my plugin based on the