JESS: Oh I feel like a gumby...

-option (slot foo) (slot option)) Cheers, Simon -- Simon Harris RedHill Consulting, Pty. Ltd. 12/55-67 Batman Street West Melbourne VIC 3003 +61 417 505 611 http://www.redhillconsulting.com.au To unsubscribe, send the words

Re: JESS: Oh I feel like a gumby...

I think I'll stick with option one then. Regards, Simon On Thu, 27 May 2004 06:40:13 -0700 (PDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think Simon Harris wrote: Ok. So my next question is. Given I have say half-a-dozen different options describing some facts is it better to... (deftemplate foo (slot

[no subject]

with not. Or, do I use salience to force the non-existence rules to evaluate last Or, do I try and invert the test somehow? Or, is there another solution I've not thought of? Cheers, Simon BTW, I think I'm beginning to build up a FAQ here ;-) I may have to put it up on the website. -- Simon Harris

Re: JESS: Re: your mail

salience? Again, I'm assuming it is as in my case it's likely that 80% of the logical assertions will be rolled-back once the other rules have fired. On Thu, 27 May 2004 16:48:59 -0700 (PDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think Simon Harris wrote: Do/can I somehow use logical? I don't believe it's

JESS: More best practices

or (bind ?make (assert (make (name ford))) (assert (car (vin 1234) (make ?make) (model F150 And why? Regards, Simon -- Simon Harris RedHill Consulting, Pty. Ltd. 12/55-67 Batman Street West Melbourne VIC 3003 +61 417 505 611 http://www.redhillconsulting.com.au

JESS: Question of style?

))) (assert (in-bundle ?r ?b)) Somehow I like the second option as it seems to be more extensible to new facts and relationships but how will this perform when asserting literally millions of facts? Or is there not much difference between the two? Cheers, Simon -- Simon Harris RedHill

Re: JESS: Question of style?

Thanks. After I replied I realised that defining an ad-hoc template was just as possible. Doh! Thanks again, Simon On Tue, 18 May 2004 15:02:45 -0700 (PDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think Simon Harris wrote: Is that for performans reasons or primarily understandability? I'm building an app

JESS: One last newbie question for today

and load the clp file again? Regards, Simon -- Simon Harris RedHill Consulting, Pty. Ltd. 12/55-67 Batman Street West Melbourne VIC 3003 +61 417 505 611 http://www.redhillconsulting.com.au To unsubscribe, send the words