New API specification

2001-12-11 Thread Santiago Gala
Setera, Craig wrote: >I took a look at the new portal API specification. It looks excellent. I >like the parallels being drawn between the portlet API and the servlets API. >When is the plan to decide on this proposal and begin implementation? Soon >after 1.3a2? > The idea after we have stabil

Re: Final Release 1.3a2

2001-12-11 Thread Paul Spencer
David, Great job on the release :) I assume you are sill working on the following? 1) General release announcement ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 2) Update version and link on http://jakarta.apache.org/site/binindex.html I have added the version 1.3a2 and 1.3a3-dev/CVS to bugzilla. Later today I will up

Re: New API specification

2001-12-11 Thread Paul Spencer
I agree with the general idea of completing 1.3 and starting a 2.0 based on a new API. Paul Spencer Santiago Gala wrote: > Setera, Craig wrote: > >> I took a look at the new portal API specification. It looks >> excellent. I >> like the parallels being drawn between the portlet API and the

Re: New API specification

2001-12-11 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 12/11/01 8:58 AM, "Paul Spencer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree with the general idea of completing 1.3 and starting a 2.0 based > on a new API. Possibly based on Turbine 3.x? :-) > Paul Spencer > > Santiago Gala wrote: > >> Setera, Craig wrote: >> >>> I took a look at the new port

Re: New API specification

2001-12-11 Thread Santiago Gala
Jason van Zyl wrote: >On 12/11/01 8:58 AM, "Paul Spencer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>I agree with the general idea of completing 1.3 and starting a 2.0 based >>on a new API. >> > >Possibly based on Turbine 3.x? :-) > I agree, provided that a stable turbine release is scheduled. We have had t

Re: Final Release 1.3a2

2001-12-11 Thread David Sean Taylor
First of all, sorry about sending the announcement emails out as HTML email. Im out of the office and using a company computer, and didn't realize the mail settings until I received the mail this morning. > 1) General release announcement ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Done > 2) Update version and link on

Release 1.3a2 and cache - BUG!

2001-12-11 Thread ICM S Op Guest 5
Hi, there must be a change in the jetspeed caching process. When I go to the customizer an make some changes, very often I don't see them because the browser displays a cached version of this page. When I continue work with this page it is possible to have a completly wired profile at the end!

Re: New API specification

2001-12-11 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 12/11/01 10:43 AM, "Santiago Gala" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jason van Zyl wrote: > >> On 12/11/01 8:58 AM, "Paul Spencer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> I agree with the general idea of completing 1.3 and starting a 2.0 based >>> on a new API. >>> >> >> Possibly based on Turbine 3.x

update site (was: Final Release 1.3a2)

2001-12-11 Thread Martin Poeschl
David Sean Taylor wrote: > First of all, sorry about sending the announcement emails out as HTML email. > Im out of the office and using a company computer, and didn't realize the > mail settings until I received the mail this morning. > > >>1) General release announcement ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) >

Re: New API specification

2001-12-11 Thread Santiago Gala
Jason van Zyl wrote: >On 12/11/01 10:43 AM, "Santiago Gala" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Jason van Zyl wrote: >> >>>On 12/11/01 8:58 AM, "Paul Spencer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I agree with the general idea of completing 1.3 and starting a 2.0 based on a new API. >>>Possibly

Re: New API specification

2001-12-11 Thread David Sean Taylor
> > What problems have you had since the release of 2.1? I think that a lot of > your problems are self inflicted. > Yes, by choosing to base Jetspeed on Turbine ;-) I personally had lots of problems getting all the jars to sync up between torque/turbine/velocity. I don't want to go there again,

Re: update site (was: Final Release 1.3a2)

2001-12-11 Thread David Sean Taylor
Martin, Yup, I've got insufficient karma: Access denied: Insufficient Karma (taylor|jakarta-site2/xdocs/site) hell, and I thought I had too much of that stuff going on lately! Could you please update xdocs/site/binindex.xml? The diff is included below. Thanks, David Index: binindex.xm

Re: update site (was: Final Release 1.3a2)

2001-12-11 Thread Martin Poeschl
David Sean Taylor wrote: > Martin, > > Yup, I've got insufficient karma: > > Access denied: Insufficient Karma (taylor|jakarta-site2/xdocs/site) > > hell, and I thought I had too much of that stuff going on lately! > > Could you please update xdocs/site/binindex.xml? > The diff is inclu

Re: New API specification

2001-12-11 Thread David Sean Taylor
> The idea after we have stabilized 1.3a2, we could proceed in two > separate lines: > - Go for a 1.3 that is basically as 1.3a2 with bugs removed, better > security, ... > - Go for a 2.0 that would use the new portal API specification. For > this work I would like to have feedback from the IBM

Help: Frameworks

2001-12-11 Thread Kakileti, Kishore
David This is Kishore from State Street Corp. I am exactly trying to figure it out which frame work to choose. So far, I understand jakarta-commons, avalon, struts a little bit. Trying to understand cocoon, turbine2, turbine3. Could you share your findings/recommendations on framework with m

RE: Help: Frameworks

2001-12-11 Thread Kakileti, Kishore
Sorry for the posting to jetspeed-dev. I intent to address David. Thanks Kishore > -Original Message- > From: Kakileti, Kishore > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 3:07 PM > To: 'Jetspeed Developers List' > Subject: Help: Frameworks > > David > > This is Kishore from

Re: update site (was: Final Release 1.3a2)

2001-12-11 Thread David Sean Taylor
Martin, Can you try to incorporate the included file into news.xml? I can't seem to get it to build, its complaining about an incompatible signature. Should I be posting the announcement anywhere else? (This is only an alpha release) Thanks, David 11 December 2001 - Jetspeed v1.3a2 R

Re: update site (was: Final Release 1.3a2)

2001-12-11 Thread Martin Poeschl
David Sean Taylor wrote: > Martin, > > Can you try to incorporate the included file into news.xml? > I can't seem to get it to build, its complaining about an incompatible > signature. > Should I be posting the announcement anywhere else? (This is only an alpha > release) ther are alpha and be

Re: Release 1.3a2 and cache - BUG!

2001-12-11 Thread David Sean Taylor
Im not seeing that one - do you have steps to reproduce... - Original Message - From: "ICM S Op Guest 5" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jetspeed Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 9:54 AM Subject: Release 1.3a2 and cache - BUG! > Hi, > > there must be a chan

Re: update site (was: Final Release 1.3a2)

2001-12-11 Thread David Sean Taylor
> ther are alpha and beta anouncments in news.xml ... i'll add it .. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

AW: Release 1.3a2 and cache - BUG!

2001-12-11 Thread Andreas Kempf
I tested it right now on my home pc without any problems. Perhaps it's because I am using tomcat 3.2.3 in the office and 3.3 at home? I will install tomcat 3.3 on my office computer, tomorrow... -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: David Sean Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Diensta