On May 21, 2004, at 5:08 AM, Raphaël Luta wrote:
Le 20 mai 04, à 19:14, David Sean Taylor a écrit :
The phase2-schema.xml has support for SUB_PAGES.
The database PSML schema design (not completely implemented in the
component) also supports the concept of FRAGMENT_REFS
Like J1 references, a fragme
Le 20 mai 04, à 19:14, David Sean Taylor a écrit :
The phase2-schema.xml has support for SUB_PAGES.
The database PSML schema design (not completely implemented in the
component) also supports the concept of FRAGMENT_REFS
Like J1 references, a fragment reference references fragments
outside of the
On May 19, 2004, at 9:28 AM, Raphaël Luta wrote:
Le 18 mai 04, à 18:45, David Sean Taylor a écrit :
On May 18, 2004, at 8:14 AM, Scott T Weaver wrote:
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 10:57, David Le Strat wrote:
Roger,
I read the proposal and the proposed changes look good
to me.
Quick question: I am assumin
Raphaël Luta wrote:
Le 18 mai 04, à 18:45, David Sean Taylor a écrit :
On May 18, 2004, at 8:14 AM, Scott T Weaver wrote:
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 10:57, David Le Strat wrote:
Roger,
I read the proposal and the proposed changes look good
to me.
Quick question: I am assuming that we will be
supporting
Le 18 mai 04, à 18:45, David Sean Taylor a écrit :
On May 18, 2004, at 8:14 AM, Scott T Weaver wrote:
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 10:57, David Le Strat wrote:
Roger,
I read the proposal and the proposed changes look good
to me.
Quick question: I am assuming that we will be
supporting nested pages, correc
David Sean Taylor wrote:
On May 18, 2004, at 8:14 AM, Scott T Weaver wrote:
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 10:57, David Le Strat wrote:
Roger,
I read the proposal and the proposed changes look good
to me.
Quick question: I am assuming that we will be
supporting nested pages, correct?
Since a Page is a Frag
David Sean Taylor wrote:
On May 18, 2004, at 8:14 AM, Scott T Weaver wrote:
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 10:57, David Le Strat wrote:
Roger,
I read the proposal and the proposed changes look good
to me.
Quick question: I am assuming that we will be
supporting nested pages, correct?
Since a Page is a Fragm
On May 18, 2004, at 8:14 AM, Scott T Weaver wrote:
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 10:57, David Le Strat wrote:
Roger,
I read the proposal and the proposed changes look good
to me.
Quick question: I am assuming that we will be
supporting nested pages, correct?
Since a Page is a Fragment and a Page is collect
+1 on 4 as well.
Another question:
I am assuming that the page decorator will provide
menu support, correct?
If you want
Tab 1 - Tab 2 - Tab 3
For Tab 1
Sub Tab 1 - Sub Tab 2 - Sub Tab 3
where tab 1 -> page1
and sub tab 1 -> page 1.1 (page 1.1 is nested in page
1)
etc.
What mechanisms are we pl
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [J2} Proposal for Layout, pages & Decorator handling in J2
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 10:57, David Le Strat wrote:
> Roger,
>
> I read the proposal and the proposed changes look good
> to me.
>
> Quick question: I am assuming that we will be
> su
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 10:57, David Le Strat wrote:
> Roger,
>
> I read the proposal and the proposed changes look good
> to me.
>
> Quick question: I am assuming that we will be
> supporting nested pages, correct?
Since a Page is a Fragment and a Page is collection of fragments, I
would say yes.
Roger,
I read the proposal and the proposed changes look good
to me.
Quick question: I am assuming that we will be
supporting nested pages, correct?
Additionally, have you thought of the impact of the
change to the navigation context. It could be nice if
following that change the portal URL cou
I have checked-in a design proposal for how layouts, pages and decorators should be
handled in J2.
The first part of the document describes the current state and the last chapter
proposes a list of changes in order to enhance the current implementation.
The document can be found under /design-d
13 matches
Mail list logo
