Re: moving to 2.3

2003-09-04 Thread Henning P. Schmiedehausen
David Sean Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Yes. If you're using the tools, you simply change the class names for >> the >> tools in TR.props and then you're set. >> >And for the DynamicURI class? The whole URI code has been reworked (newly written) and has now a unified API. It resides in

Re: moving to 2.3

2003-09-02 Thread David Sean Taylor
On Tuesday, September 2, 2003, at 08:43 AM, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: Deprecated DynamicURI and TemplateLink? Yes. Is there a migration path? Yes. If you're using the tools, you simply change the class names for the tools in TR.props and then you're set. And for the DynamicURI class? I

Re: moving to 2.3

2003-09-02 Thread Henning P. Schmiedehausen
David Sean Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> -The parameter parse has been heavily rewritten and back-ported from >> Fulcrum, which was much better, and should give better results now >> >Thats a little scary without good HttpUnit/JWebUnit are similar tests >in place >I hope that the behavio

RE: moving to 2.3

2003-09-02 Thread Mark Orciuch
> Deprecated DynamicURI and TemplateLink? > Is there a migration path? > Im afraid we are heavily dependent on that one. > My vote is that we do not move to the new version of Turbine until it > is THOROUGHLY TESTED Big +1 on that. I'd go further than that and defer this item until AFTER the final

Re: moving to 2.3

2003-09-02 Thread David Sean Taylor
On Tuesday, September 2, 2003, at 12:51 AM, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: David Sean Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Your "problems" zones are basically the hotspots where we worked on Turbine. :-) - FileUpload now uses commons-fileupload Yes I use this now in another project, it works g

Re: moving to 2.3

2003-09-02 Thread Henning P. Schmiedehausen
David Sean Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Your "problems" zones are basically the hotspots where we worked on Turbine. :-) - FileUpload now uses commons-fileupload -The parameter parse has been heavily rewritten and back-ported from Fulcrum, which was much better, and should give better re

Re: moving to 2.3

2003-09-01 Thread David Sean Taylor
On Monday, September 1, 2003, at 08:24 AM, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: "Mark Orciuch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Actually, we have just completed the move to commons logging. Is logging the only potential issue with Turbine? I will try to release the 2.3 code base either today or tomorro

Re: moving to 2.3

2003-09-01 Thread Henning P. Schmiedehausen
"Mark Orciuch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Actually, we have just completed the move to commons logging. Is logging the >only potential issue with Turbine? I will try to release the 2.3 code base either today or tomorrow. After this I intend to do some work in porting Jetspeed v1 to Turbine 2.3.

YNT: moving to 2.3

2003-08-30 Thread Ender Hikmet KILIÇOÐLU
List Konu: Re: moving to 2.3 ok, i patched my local copy to avoid usage of deprecated stuff .. but i can't create a patch (seems to be a bug in eclipse 3.0 M3 :-(( ) martin Mark Orciuch wrote: >Martin, > >Let's direct further discussions on this topic here: > &g

Re: moving to 2.3

2003-08-30 Thread Martin Poeschl
2825 Best regards, Mark Orciuch - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jakarta Jetspeed - Enterprise Portal in Java http://jakarta.apache.org/jetspeed/ -Original Message- From: Martin Poeschl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 3:35 PM To: Jetspeed Users List Subject: Re: moving to 2.3 ther

RE: moving to 2.3

2003-08-29 Thread Mark Orciuch
rom: Martin Poeschl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 3:35 PM > To: Jetspeed Users List > Subject: Re: moving to 2.3 > > > ther should be no deprecation warnings using turbine-2.2 as most of the > stuff has been removed .. i can send the patches for torque an

Re: moving to 2.3

2003-08-29 Thread Martin Poeschl
PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 2:25 PM To: Jetspeed Users List Subject: Re: moving to 2.3 i can help with the migration .. moving to torque 3.1 is easy (just replace the jars :-) turbine is little bit harder as jetspped uses the turbine logging services which has been removed .. so fixing

RE: moving to 2.3

2003-08-29 Thread Mark Orciuch
oeschl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 2:25 PM > To: Jetspeed Users List > Subject: Re: moving to 2.3 > > > i can help with the migration .. moving to torque 3.1 is easy (just > replace the jars :-) > turbine is little bit harder as jetspped uses the tu

Re: moving to 2.3

2003-08-29 Thread Martin Poeschl
i can help with the migration .. moving to torque 3.1 is easy (just replace the jars :-) turbine is little bit harder as jetspped uses the turbine logging services which has been removed .. so fixing the logging stuff first is a good idea ;-) martin Ender Hikmet KILIÇOÐLU wrote: Hi any plan t

moving to 2.3

2003-08-29 Thread Ender Hikmet KILIÇOÐLU
Hi any plan to migrate next release of turbine for jetspeed v1 Ender - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]