Changeset: 471d26171bcf
Author:erikj
Date: 2015-11-11 10:24 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/rev/471d26171bcf
Removing dead code
- make/CompileModuleInfos.gmk
Changeset: 887db7246c21
Author:erikj
Date: 2015-11-11 10:24 +0100
URL:
On 11/11/2015 11:07, Wang Weijun wrote:
:
I'm prototyping in jake and the change is
src/java.base/share/classes/module-info.java:
exports sun.security.util to
+jdk.security.cert,
exports sun.security.x509 to
+jdk.security.cert,
> On Nov 11, 2015, at 3:24 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
>
> On 11/11/2015 03:20, Wang Weijun wrote:
>> Ping again.
>>
>> Will the future JRE only include java.se? In other words, what will the
>> java.com download for non-developers contain?
>>
> This isn't really a
On 11/11/2015 09:54, Wang Weijun wrote:
:
Here comes the question: How do I request a new module to be included in it?
The CCC for the new module/API?
Can you cc jigsaw-dev on the changes to modules.xml? modules.xml is the
temporary document that we have in JDK 9 to define the modular
On 11/11/2015 03:20, Wang Weijun wrote:
Ping again.
Will the future JRE only include java.se? In other words, what will the
java.com download for non-developers contain?
This isn't really a quick for here. However, in your build environment
then use jre/bin/java -listmods to see the full
> On Nov 11, 2015, at 5:03 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
> On 11/11/2015 09:54, Wang Weijun wrote:
>> :
>>
>> Here comes the question: How do I request a new module to be included in it?
>> The CCC for the new module/API?
>>
> Can you cc jigsaw-dev on the changes to
> On Nov 10, 2015, at 11:42 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
>
>
> On 09/11/2015 19:12, Alexandre (Shura) Iline wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I have just realized that an NPE could also be possible in
>> test/lib/testlibrary/jdk/testlibrary/Platform.java so it should be updated
>>
Changeset: 7c66438d4d8a
Author:jlahoda
Date: 2015-11-11 15:27 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/rev/7c66438d4d8a
Setting UsesProviderCompleter to ModuleSymbol.usesProvidersCompleter, to avoid
running it too soon.
!
> On Nov 10, 2015, at 9:04 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
>
> Hi Shura,
>
> Thanks for doing it and it’s good to see the unnecessary dependency to
> java.management eliminated.
>
> The new jdk.testlibrary.management package name is fine. It’s okay to keep
> the class name