Re: Sync with jdk9 and ASM alpha 2

2017-01-30 Thread forax
jigsaw-dev" > Envoyé: Lundi 30 Janvier 2017 10:16:23 > Objet: Re: Sync with jdk9 and ASM alpha 2 > Hi, > are there any pending changes to the class file format? Looking forward to the > Alpha 2 release :) >> On 11 Dec 2016, at 17:21, Alan Bateman < alan.bate...@or

Re: Sync with jdk9 and ASM alpha 2

2017-01-30 Thread Roman Shevchenko
Hi, are there any pending changes to the class file format? Looking forward to the Alpha 2 release :) > On 11 Dec 2016, at 17:21, Alan Bateman wrote: > > On 11/12/2016 13:05, Remi Forax wrote: > >> Hi Alan, >> if i get it right, the jdk9 b148 (not the jigsaw version) get a refresh of >> mod

Re: Sync with jdk9 and ASM alpha 2

2016-12-11 Thread Alan Bateman
On 11/12/2016 13:05, Remi Forax wrote: Hi Alan, if i get it right, the jdk9 b148 (not the jigsaw version) get a refresh of module-info classfile format but did not get the last two changes, version of requires and the two new constant pool entries. Do you plan to push these changes in the jdk9

Sync with jdk9 and ASM alpha 2

2016-12-11 Thread Remi Forax
Hi Alan, if i get it right, the jdk9 b148 (not the jigsaw version) get a refresh of module-info classfile format but did not get the last two changes, version of requires and the two new constant pool entries. Do you plan to push these changes in the jdk9 workspace soon so i will delay the releas