Maybe this will help to resolve my problem... (i hope)
I get the following exception in the JMeter log file:
01/22/2003 1:30:50 PM WARN - jmeter.protocol.http: file1 (The system cannot find the
file specified) java.io.FileNotFoundException: file1 (The system cannot find the file
specified)
I'm using 1.8 , that might explain it all.
I'll try it with the latest nightly.
Thanks
Amos
-Original Message-
From: Mike Stover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 3:35 PM
To: JMeter Users List
Subject: Re: FW: Send file with request is not working for
test
Derrick D Robertson
BTexact Technologies
Business Solutions Research Lab
Communications rep for Business Systems Research Lab
http://technology.intra.bt.com/enterprise-research/labs/bus-sys%20lab.htm
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel: (+44)(0)1473 606521
mob: (+44)(0)7718923254
MLBG
Is it possible it's running out of stack memory, as opposed to heap? I've
had that problem
before when I was parsing response HTML for certain things, there's a lot of
recursive calls in
the parsing of HTML sometimes, and for one particular test, I was running
out of stack
memory. The 4
I'm thinking that it's something to do with the fact that the 'distant'
machine is on a different subnet. Perhaps, it can't offload it's numbers to
my Master machine quick enough. I mean, it works in standalone. It's doing
the same thing as a slave, only reporting the numbers back to the
On 23/01/2003 1:49 AM, Lawrence, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm.. I have no idea, but thanks for the pointers. I'm not parsing anything
mind you.. I simply recorded a bunch of clicks on a page, and upp'ed the
thread count to 50, and the loop to 20.
When you record a script in this manner
On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 16:48, Cameron Zemek wrote:
[snip]
I can't believe it. I got remote testing working, and it give accurate
results for 100 threads with 0sec ramp-up. Remote testing wasn't working
because the client machine was reporting the wrong ip address because of
an old entry in
On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 17:02, Scott Eade wrote:
1. Set a ramp-up figure of greater than 0s - to start 1 thread per second
use 100s.
Then the thread finishes before the next one starts. I want 100 threads
running at the same time.
2. Have you tried with a lower number of threads first - e.g. 1,
On 23/01/2003 6:18 PM, Cameron Zemek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 17:02, Scott Eade wrote:
1. Set a ramp-up figure of greater than 0s - to start 1 thread per second
use 100s.
Then the thread finishes before the next one starts. I want 100 threads
running at the same time.
On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 17:37, Scott Eade wrote:
On 23/01/2003 6:18 PM, Cameron Zemek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 17:02, Scott Eade wrote:
1. Set a ramp-up figure of greater than 0s - to start 1 thread per second
use 100s.
Then the thread finishes before the next one
10 matches
Mail list logo
