RE: Adding functionality to the HTTP Proxy Server

Done (updated the bug), attached test plan and described the variant. regartds Nino -Original Message- From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 20-03-2007 11:31 To: JMeter Users List Subject: Re: Adding functionality to the HTTP Proxy Server In that case, please either update

Re: Adding functionality to the HTTP Proxy Server

item or not. regards Nino -Original Message- From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 19-03-2007 19:50 To: JMeter Users List Subject: Re: Adding functionality to the HTTP Proxy Server Are you sure that is the correct bug? There is an easy work-round for it - don't change the sele

RE: Adding functionality to the HTTP Proxy Server

ino Wael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sendt: ma 19-03-2007 17:39 > Til: JMeter Users List; JMeter Users List > Emne: SV: Adding functionality to the HTTP Proxy Server > > > > I'll check if its the same, > > looks as it might be an variant something tod

Re: Adding functionality to the HTTP Proxy Server

ter Users List; JMeter Users List Emne: SV: Adding functionality to the HTTP Proxy Server I'll check if its the same, looks as it might be an variant something todo with a test plan with too many recording controllers.. i'll get back to you..

SV: Adding functionality to the HTTP Proxy Server

egards Nino Fra: Nino Wael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: ma 19-03-2007 17:39 Til: JMeter Users List; JMeter Users List Emne: SV: Adding functionality to the HTTP Proxy Server I'll check if its the same, looks as it might be an variant something todo with a test plan with too

SV: Adding functionality to the HTTP Proxy Server

t Emne: Re: Adding functionality to the HTTP Proxy Server Nino Wael wrote: > Could be really great if you could fix the I mentioned in another thread here > recently. It's actually pretty critical. > > I'll be happy to provide more extensively information about it. >

Re: Adding functionality to the HTTP Proxy Server

On 17/03/07, Alf Høgemark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: sebb wrote: > > I think that has already have been done via a property - > jmeter.httpsampler - but it could be turned into a GUI option. > Yes, that setting controls what class the HTTPSamplerFactory will instantiate. But by changing it to H

Re: Adding functionality to the HTTP Proxy Server

Nino Wael wrote: Could be really great if you could fix the I mentioned in another thread here recently. It's actually pretty critical. I'll be happy to provide more extensively information about it. regards Nino Hi. Is your problem really : http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.

Re: Adding functionality to the HTTP Proxy Server

sebb wrote: I think that has already have been done via a property - jmeter.httpsampler - but it could be turned into a GUI option. Yes, that setting controls what class the HTTPSamplerFactory will instantiate. But by changing it to HTTPSampler2, and trying to use the HTTP Proxy, you get an

Re: Adding functionality to the HTTP Proxy Server

On 17/03/07, Alf Høgemark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi I am considering doing some work on the HTTP Proxy Server. Here is what I've thought about so far : - Make it possible to filter requests by specifying "content type to include" and "content type to exclude" regular expressions Good idea

RE: Adding functionality to the HTTP Proxy Server

03-2007 09:09 To: jmeter-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Adding functionality to the HTTP Proxy Server Hi I am considering doing some work on the HTTP Proxy Server. Here is what I've thought about so far : - Make it possible to filter requests by specifying "content type to include&q

Adding functionality to the HTTP Proxy Server

Hi I am considering doing some work on the HTTP Proxy Server. Here is what I've thought about so far : - Make it possible to filter requests by specifying "content type to include" and "content type to exclude" regular expressions - Allow user to specify if the HTTP Request or HTTP Request HTTP