>Got it and appreciate the reply.
No probs.
>I am using Win2K but it looks like the threading is behaving in a manner
similar NT.
That's what I thought. Before the marketing people kicked into action, Win2K/XP
was generally referred to as NT 5.0, so I'm not surprised that the thread
behaviour
i
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Ramshaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
> My experience with NT 4.0 was that it had a limit of 64
> threads (some of which were needed internally), which meant
> that the most I could use was approx. 58. NT 4.0 is [was?] a
> time-slice OS rather tha
My experience with NT 4.0 was that it had a limit of 64 threads (some of which
were needed internally), which meant that the most I could use was approx. 58.
NT 4.0 is [was?] a time-slice OS rather than a full multi-process OS which had
specific affects on thread processing. Perhaps MS fixed this
ner lets go of them as soon as they are written
to disk.
> -Original Message-
> From: david garcia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 7:03 PM
> To: JMeter Users List
> Subject: Java Performance.
>
>
> First I would like to congratulat
ave you tried using the Hotspot server VM? Supposedly it handles threads
better than the client version.
-Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: david garcia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 7:03 PM
> To: JMeter Users List
> Subject: Java Performanc
go of them as soon as they are written
to disk.
> -Original Message-
> From: david garcia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 7:03 PM
> To: JMeter Users List
> Subject: Java Performance.
>
>
> First I would like to congratulate the JMete
First I would like to congratulate the JMeter team for creating a great tool that is
getting even better everyday. Secondly I could use some help on one minor issue. . .
I seemed to have hit a bottleneck with repect to the number of simultaneous threads
that can be generated using Jmeter1.7 (m
7 matches
Mail list logo
