Re: Throughput in Aggregate report

2007-06-13 Thread sebb
Ah - that was a bug in 2.2. It's fixed in the current code. [I'll probably change the default to save the byte count] S. On 13/06/07, tiffany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It's better after I configuring the listener to save the byte count, the value of throughput don't change, but the last colum

Re: Throughput in Aggregate report

2007-06-13 Thread tiffany
It's better after I configuring the listener to save the byte count, the value of throughput don't change, but the last column "KB/sec" are still all with 0.00. Thanks, Tiffany sebb-2 wrote: > > Did you save configure the listener to save the byte count? > > On 13/06/07, tiffany <[EMAIL PROT

Re: Throughput in Aggregate report

2007-06-13 Thread sebb
Did you save configure the listener to save the byte count? On 13/06/07, tiffany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I have saved my aggregate report for a test and then exit Jmeter. And then I run Jmeter and open the saved aggregate report, why the values in Throughput are changed and the last col

Re: Throughput in Aggregate report

2006-12-17 Thread Jian Tong
/14/06, Ron Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Peter, I searched for your article but couldn't find it. Would you > please send a link to it? > > Ron > > -Original Message- > From: Peter Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 14,

Re: Throughput in Aggregate report

2006-12-15 Thread git
t? > > > > Ron > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Peter Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 3:24 PM > > To: JMeter Users List > > Subject: Re: Throughput in Aggregate report > > > > usually I look at the

Re: Throughput in Aggregate report

2006-12-14 Thread Peter Lin
: Peter Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 3:24 PM To: JMeter Users List Subject: Re: Throughput in Aggregate report usually I look at the capacity of the network and determine if the bytes/sec is going to saturate the bandwidth or not. I have an article in the wiki th

RE: Throughput in Aggregate report

2006-12-14 Thread Ron Miller
Peter, I searched for your article but couldn't find it. Would you please send a link to it? Ron -Original Message- From: Peter Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 3:24 PM To: JMeter Users List Subject: Re: Throughput in Aggregate report usually I lo

Re: Throughput in Aggregate report

2006-12-14 Thread Peter Lin
usually I look at the capacity of the network and determine if the bytes/sec is going to saturate the bandwidth or not. I have an article in the wiki that explains this stuff in detail. peter On 12/14/06, Jian Tong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Peter, As you said bytes/sec and requests/sec

Re: Throughput in Aggregate report

2006-12-14 Thread Jian Tong
Hi Peter,   As you said bytes/sec and requests/sec are better metrics for load testing, then I hope to know what the benchmark is for bytes/sec and requests/sec from your experience ?   Thanks   Jian Tong>>> "Peter Lin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/13/06 8:29 PM >>> jmeter will measure the req

Re: Throughput in Aggregate report

2006-12-13 Thread Peter Lin
- From: Peter Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 5:30 PM To: JMeter Users List Subject: Re: Throughput in Aggregate report jmeter will measure the requests per second. that isn't the same as pages per second for a couple of reasons. 1. a page may have multiple i

RE: Throughput in Aggregate report

2006-12-13 Thread Ron Miller
- From: Peter Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 5:30 PM To: JMeter Users List Subject: Re: Throughput in Aggregate report jmeter will measure the requests per second. that isn't the same as pages per second for a couple of reasons. 1. a page may have mult

Re: Throughput in Aggregate report

2006-12-13 Thread Peter Lin
jmeter will measure the requests per second. that isn't the same as pages per second for a couple of reasons. 1. a page may have multiple images and stuff embedded 2. images are cached by the browser the first time it's loaded 3. not every page is the same, so page per second a poor measurement o