On 22 July 2010 12:21, Jörg Godau wrote:
>> Please don't include test plans in e-mail in future. They are
>> difficult to extract, and are just wasted bandwidth for most readers.
>
> Sorry. How else can I share the test files?
As I wrote previously:
"I suggest creating a Bugzilla issue and attac
> Please don't include test plans in e-mail in future. They are
> difficult to extract, and are just wasted bandwidth for most readers.
Sorry. How else can I share the test files?
Is there a Jmeter forum somewhere? That might be a more modern (and easily
searchable) way of doing this?
> Also,
On 22 July 2010 09:15, Jörg Godau wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've stripped down the test plan to be as small as possible, perhaps you
> could have a look at it (see the end of this email) and tell me if there is
> something wrong with the way we are doing things?
Please don't include test plans in e-m
Hello,
I've stripped down the test plan to be as small as possible, perhaps you could
have a look at it (see the end of this email) and tell me if there is something
wrong with the way we are doing things?
We have a thread group that loops, which contains the User Parameters, after
that there
The JMeter code is synchronised where it saves the variables.
Also, the set of variables is chosen using threadNum % varCount, so a
given thread will always get the same set.
I don't see how the variables can get out of step unless some other
test element is updating one of the values.
I suggest
> What about "Update once per iteration" - is that selected or not?
Not selected.
> And where is the User Parameter Pre-Processor in the test plan?
> Is it in scope of multiple samplers?
Sorry I'm not sure I understand the question. I've provided a screenshot of our
test plan in the "testplan.
> 813181239
>
>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Juli 2010 15:55
>> An: JMeter Users List
>> Betreff: Re: User Parameters not always correctly allocated?
>>
>> How are you setting up th
B 73618
Umsatzsteuer-Identifikationsnummer gemäß § 27a Umsatzsteuergesetz: DE 813181239
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Juli 2010 15:55
> An: JMeter Users List
> Betreff: Re: User Parameters not always correctly allocated?
>
&g
er: Klaus-Dieter Schütze
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg
> Registernummer: HRB 73618
> Umsatzsteuer-Identifikationsnummer gemäß § 27a Umsatzsteuergesetz: DE
> 813181239
>
>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: Deepak Shetty [mailto:shet...@gmail.com]
: HRB 73618
Umsatzsteuer-Identifikationsnummer gemäß § 27a Umsatzsteuergesetz: DE 813181239
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Deepak Shetty [mailto:shet...@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 16. Juli 2010 18:03
> An: JMeter Users List
> Betreff: Re: User Parameters not always
hi
You can simulate the same behavior with a single thread as well right? While
I can understand there might be a JMeter bug that manifests itself under
parallel access , i cant quite see how this happens with a single thread.
What are you thread group settings for the sing thread , you run multipl
Hello Deepak, hello all,
I have used the Debug Sampler and found that the problem persists.
The user id and the file shown in the debug are correct and matching:
user.id=110809336
resource.file=familiennamen_04.csv
The name extracted from the file with
${_StringFromFile(${resource.path}/$
Hi
I havent observed problems with User Parameters . Use a debug sampler or
modifying the sampler name to include the values of user.id and
resource.file , can you check that your variables are always in step(the
user id, the resource file and the record) .
If there isnt a problem with your script
Hi,
we have a situation where we need the user parameters to always be applied in a
group (which I thought was actually the default behaviour?).
Example:
We have two parameters that need to be managed as a pair: user.id and
resource.file
The user.id defines which user logs into the system bein
14 matches
Mail list logo
