Re: [Jmol-developers] packaging jmol, was Re: I want to contribute

2010-07-18 Thread Egon Willighagen
origin: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org Hi Michael, I am not sure about that... Bob, Nico: are the selfSignedCertificate/* files supposed to be part of the source distribution? If not, should the build.xml not work without them? On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Michael Banck wrote: > I just

[Jmol-developers] Has anybody tried compiling a version of Jmol for Android?

2010-07-18 Thread Jonathan Gutow
I was wondering if Android would support java applets in browsers, but so far it does not. Part of the problem appears to be that the GUI in Android is just a kind of JVM, which makes it difficult to launch another JVM inside it. I found a little that suggests it can be done, but nothing very

Re: [Jmol-developers] packaging jmol, was Re: I want to contribute

2010-07-18 Thread Robert Hanson
I'm pretty sure those are created and signed locally. On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:25 AM, Egon Willighagen < egon.willigha...@gmail.com> wrote: > origin: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org > > > Hi Michael, > > I am not sure about that... > > Bob, Nico: > > are the selfSignedCertificate/* files suppose

Re: [Jmol-developers] packaging jmol, was Re: I want to contribute

2010-07-18 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Robert Hanson wrote: > I'm pretty sure those are created and signed locally. Is that supposed to happen automatically? Egon -- Post-doc @ Uppsala University Proteochemometrics / Bioclipse Group of Prof. Jarl Wikberg Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/ Blog: http

Re: [Jmol-developers] packaging jmol, was Re: I want to contribute

2010-07-18 Thread Nicolas Vervelle
Hi, These files are under SVN, so they could also be released in the source distribution. The only thing is that this certificate is simply a self signed one, so without any real security. If someone wants to really use the signed applet, I suggest resigning the official applet with a correct cer