Re: [Jmol-developers] high priority problem

2011-11-02 Thread Robert Hanson
I bet I know what it is. This is the place in the code where we use Point3i pt0 = new Point3i() Point3i pt = new Point3i(pt0) I bet it's a Java versioning problem. I bet the Point3i class file we are using does not have the initializer: Point3i(Point3i pt); and in PC versions, Java has that na

Re: [Jmol-developers] high priority problem

2011-11-02 Thread Robert Hanson
of course, that's new Point3i() not new Point3i(2,3,4) On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Robert Hanson wrote: > Meaning I used Eclipse as always to build it. > > C:\jmol-dev\workspace\Jmol\build\JmolApplet0.jar\javax\vecmath\ > > shows Point3i.class definitely there, and of course it's a Mac-o

Re: [Jmol-developers] high priority problem

2011-11-02 Thread Robert Hanson
Meaning I used Eclipse as always to build it. C:\jmol-dev\workspace\Jmol\build\JmolApplet0.jar\javax\vecmath\ shows Point3i.class definitely there, and of course it's a Mac-only problem. And Annemarie's Java console reports preloading Point3i (AND getting an instance!!) without any error. Java

Re: [Jmol-developers] high priority problem

2011-11-02 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Miguel Howard wrote: > I suggest that you simply rename the rename the 3D math packages that > are used by Jmol. That is, use eclipse and rename from javax.Point3i > to org.jmol.javax.Point3i ... or something like that. We have the > source code included in the repo

Re: [Jmol-developers] high priority problem

2011-11-02 Thread Miguel Howard
Hmmm ... very strange. When you say "compiled on a PC" ... Q: Do you know if the build is taking place in Eclipse? I'm not sure what kind of effect this would have, but it is a factor *** 2 minutes later *** Here is my theory: Jmol uses an independently-developed implementation of javax.Poin

Re: [Jmol-developers] high priority problem

2011-11-02 Thread Jonathan Gutow
I would not be surprised by this as we are using a very old vecmath the last time I checked. Jonathan On Nov 2, 2011, at 7:28 AM, Egon Willighagen wrote: > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Egon Willighagen > wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Robert Hanson wrote: >>> We have two independ

Re: [Jmol-developers] high priority problem

2011-11-02 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Egon Willighagen wrote: > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Robert Hanson wrote: >> We have two independent reports of javax.Point3i problems when Jmol Jar >> files are compiled on a PC and run on a mac. It seems somehow the Poin3i(int >> x, int y, int z) initializer

Re: [Jmol-developers] high priority problem

2011-11-02 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Robert Hanson wrote: > We have two independent reports of javax.Point3i problems when Jmol Jar > files are compiled on a PC and run on a mac. It seems somehow the Poin3i(int > x, int y, int z) initializer is missing. It sounds to me that vecmatch is missing from th

[Jmol-developers] high priority problem

2011-11-02 Thread Robert Hanson
We have two independent reports of javax.Point3i problems when Jmol Jar files are compiled on a PC and run on a mac. It seems somehow the Poin3i(int x, int y, int z) initializer is missing. What could this possibly be? Bob -- Robert M. Hanson Professor of Chemistry St. Olaf College 1520 St. Ol