Re: [Jmol-users] File download & security

> I should test this myself, but on the off chance someone else is way ahead > of me here... > > what happens if you try to access a cgi or php file with Jmol? Jmol accesses all data through URLs ... same as a web browser. So cgi files and server-side scripts work just fine with Jmol. Similarly,

Re: [Jmol-users] File download & security

>Tim wrote: >>I just worry about Jmol being somewhat of an 'open door' into my >>server, opening files and downloading coordinates, rather than simply >>rendering 3D structures. probably that is just my inexperience with >>server security, though, and a paranoia that increases as I get older. > >T

Re: [Jmol-users] Safari buttons bug

> >>>The button issue is not totally resolved, but it mostly fixed. >[snip] > >>you mean radio buttons that you code yourself, rather than ones >written by >>Jmol.js? I know that Miguel's fix was specific to Jmol.js, not >>Safari >in >>general, so it won't help the former. > >Actually, the butto

Re: [Jmol-users] Name Info

>On Wednesday 01 December 2004 18:48, timothy driscoll wrote: >>I just worry about Jmol being somewhat of an 'open door' into my >>server, opening files and downloading coordinates, rather than simply >>rendering 3D structures. probably that is just my inexperience with >>server security, though,

[Jmol-users] File download & security

Tim wrote: > I just worry about Jmol being somewhat of an 'open door' into my server, > opening files and downloading coordinates, rather than simply rendering 3D > structures. probably that is just my inexperience with server security, > though, and a paranoia that increases as I get older. The

[Jmol-users] Opera 7.5.4 on OSX is broken

Henry wrote: > Can also confirm that Opera 7.5.4 does not work. Opera on OS X seems quite broken. For me, I can load the first page, but cannot reload or go to another page. Opera 7.5.4 works fine on Win32. Miguel --- SF email is sponsored

[Jmol-users] slow downloads javaplugin

> eventually, I can see the caffeine molecule, but now it takes several > minutes. sadly, the Liveconnect seems to be completely broken, even > though I have installed the JavaEmbedding plugin and Firefox *is* using > the Apple JVM. :-( > > I did test this url on nov 24 with Jmol 10pre19 (same b

[Jmol-users] Safari buttons bug

>>The button issue is not totally resolved, but it mostly fixed. [snip] > you mean radio buttons that you code yourself, rather than ones written by > Jmol.js? I know that Miguel's fix was specific to Jmol.js, not Safari in > general, so it won't help the former. Actually, the button bug that I

[Jmol-users] Safari buttons do not update

>>The button issue is not totally resolved, but it mostly fixed. >>What I note is that radio buttons (not jmol control radios) do not >>refresh. That is, when one is pushed it is turned on. If another >>is pushed, the first is not turned off. If a third is pushed, one >>or two of the previous on

[Jmol-users] Sourceforge speed issues

> I have just tried the site > with safari. it works, but also takes a full minute or more to > download. I do not remember it being that slow previously. I believe that sourceforge is having some speed issues. I do not believe that the slow performance

Re: [Jmol-users] Name Info

My $0.02: One of the only dificiencies I have seen in Jmol was its inability to act as a plug-in and save the coordinates to a file. Thus, I'm very pleased that now the "show file" function can be used not just to save the file (the user would have to clip the contents of a window, but that's OK

Re: [Jmol-users] Name Info

On Wednesday 01 December 2004 18:48, timothy driscoll wrote: > I just worry about Jmol being somewhat of an 'open door' into my server, > opening files and downloading coordinates, rather than simply rendering 3D > structures. probably that is just my inexperience with server security, > though, a

Re: [Jmol-users] Firefox?

On 2004-12-01 (12:24) Philip Bays wrote: >On Dec 1, 2004, at 10:57 AM, timothy driscoll wrote: > >>you mean radio buttons that you code yourself, rather than ones >>written by Jmol.js? I know that Miguel's fix was specific to >>Jmol.js, not Safari in general, so it won't help the former. >> >Exce

Re: [Jmol-users] Name Info

On 2004-11-30 (14:10) Eric Martz wrote: >At 11/30/04, Miguel Howard wrote: >>If we put it on the menu then the user can click on it and download >>the molecular model to another browser window and/or hard drive. > >Hooray! > >At 11/30/04, Tim Driscoll wrote: >>given this, I am somewhat leery about

Re: [Jmol-users] Firefox?

Except that they worked properly in pre-17. Phil On Dec 1, 2004, at 10:57 AM, timothy driscoll wrote: you mean radio buttons that you code yourself, rather than ones written by Jmol.js? I know that Miguel's fix was specific to Jmol.js, not Safari in general, so it won't help the former. J. Phi

Re: [Jmol-users] 'color group' and RasMol/Chime compatibility

Thanks very very much, Miguel, for making the choices so well organized and clear. I vote for 3C (or 3B OK as second choice). Among 1A, 2A, 3A, I prefer option 3A. Reasoning: Option 1 is similar to RasMol/Chime (R/C) and is not very satisfactory. Option 2 or 3 is how I wish R/C behaved. Opt

Re: [Jmol-users] Firefox?

On 2004-12-01 (10:11) Philip Bays wrote: >Tim and others: I have just tried the > site with safari. it >works, but also takes a full minute or more to download. I do not >remember it being that slow previously. So the speed issue does not >seem to be rel

Re: [Jmol-users] Firefox?

Tim and others: I have just tried the site with safari. it works, but also takes a full minute or more to download. I do not remember it being that slow previously. So the speed issue does not seem to be related to firefox for me. The button issue is

Re: [Jmol-users] Firefox?

On 2004-11-30 (11:42) Philip Bays wrote: >What has been others' experience with the latest version of Firefox >and Jmol on the Mac? (OS 10.3.6 Firefox 1.0)Mine crashes and I >am just trying to determine if it me or Firefox. > >Phil > hi Phil and Miguel, Firefox and Mozilla are both causing

[Jmol-users] Re: MacOSX browser support issues

>> I like your popup window as an alternative to my suggestion. It is >> relatively clear and does not prevent simple pages or people from at >> least seeing the molecules. > >The javaplugin does not work for me with Firefox 1.0 Fine with Mozilla 1.8a but I agree, its a struggle to keep it workin

Re: [Jmol-users] loading a string from my database in the JmolApplet

Bob wrote: > From what I can tell -- on my computer at least -- the jmol.loadInline() > function is working but the is not. Could be just > messing up with the lines. Do you have a working example in 10pre17? Bob, What was the resolution on this? Miguel ---

[Jmol-users] Re: MacOSX browser support issues

> I like your popup window as an alternative to my suggestion. It is > relatively clear and does not prevent simple pages or people from at > least seeing the molecules. Good Page authors can override the behavior if they want to. > I haven't tried your recommendation for > the Mozilla plug-in

[Jmol-users] re: reg Integration.java

> sir, > i have installed cvs. > how can i get v10? http://sourceforge.net/cvs/?group_id=23629 cvs -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/jmol co -d Jmol-HEAD Jmol The definitive documentation for CVS is at: http://cvsbook.red-bean.com/cvsbook.html - Note that per my previous two messages

Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol version 10 prerelease 21

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 01 December 2004 04:32, Miguel wrote: > Jmol version 10 pre-release 21 was released on Tue 30 Nov 2004. As usual I've added Freshmeat.net announcements... for the pre20 release we were listed 11th on activity, and with pre21 we might hi