either way is fine. I think the preferred mode is:
translateSelected x 25%
but I think the order of the tokens doesn't matter, and "translate
selected" was and older idea that is still there but undocumented.
Is it working now for you, including saves and recalls from PNGJ files?
On Mon, Jul 23
should I be using
translate x 25% selected
or
translateSelected x 25%
I do not see "translate x 25% selected" in the manual, but in my spt script it
works well, though I am not sure that it is being interpretted when reading the
state file.
"translateSelected x 25%" does not work well in my sp
http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/Jmol-13.zip
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Robert Hanson wrote:
> that wouldn't be it. Yes, do check that. Latest is just put up at
> http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/Jmol-13.jar
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Shore, Jay wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Thank you ve
that wouldn't be it. Yes, do check that. Latest is just put up at
http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/Jmol-13.jar
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Shore, Jay wrote:
>
>
> Thank you very much Bob.
> I think the problem was that I was using "translate x 33% selected"
> I wonder if the code was not i
ps -- [Note that internal cavities will show up with isosurface SOLVENT or
isosurface MOLECULAR as sets with negative volume.]
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Robert Hanson wrote:
> Got it! This had nothing to do with resolution, as it turns out. One
> simple line of code caused the problem. S
Thank you very much Bob.
I think the problem was that I was using "translate x 33% selected"
I wonder if the code was not interpreting the % correctly when opening the
.jmol file.
When I do not use the percent sign, it seems to work.
I will keep on testing.
Thank you again.
Jay
From: Robert
Got it! This had nothing to do with resolution, as it turns out. One simple
line of code caused the problem. See
http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/Jmol-13.zip
Thank you so much, Alexander, for pointing this out. It's actually been
there a very long time.
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Robert Han
Right -- Let's give it a few days to see if that gets changed on the GLmol
site.
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Angel Herráez wrote:
> > We really do not want to be in the business of distributing other's
> > code, I think.
>
> I agree.
>
> > There's no customization. Why do you think that?
>
> We really do not want to be in the business of distributing other's
> code, I think.
I agree.
> There's no customization. Why do you think that?
There are several portions of code (with your explicit name) that
differ between the file at your site and the file downloaded from the
GLmol sit
Yes, I see that, Alexander. Thanks for the PNGJ file - that is really a
great way to send issues to me. I wish everyone would do that.
I'll study this some. I really think it is an artifact of the poor
resolution. Molecular surfaces are notoriously challenging to produce, and
this one does just fi
Sorry, might be a versioning issue there. I think I forgot to upload it.
Please try http;//chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/Jmol-13.zip again.
Here's what I see:
$ load $caffeine
$ isosurface vdw
$ isosurface offset {1 1 1}
$ show $isosurface1
frame 1.1;
isosurface ID "isosurface1" select ({0:4})
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 3:15 AM, Angel Herráez wrote:
> El 22 Jul 2012 a las 17:36, Robert Hanson escribió:
> > http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/glmol/test2.htm?GLMOL
> >
> > http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/glmol/simple2.htm?GLMOL
> >
> > should be working. I forgot to upload a change in JmolGLmol
El 22 Jul 2012 a las 17:36, Robert Hanson escribió:
> http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/glmol/test2.htm?GLMOL
>
> http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/glmol/simple2.htm?GLMOL
>
> should be working. I forgot to upload a change in JmolGLmol.js
Ok.
My concern now is:
- JmolGLmol.js is included in Jmol di
13 matches
Mail list logo
