I have the same answer from firefox on mac.
Pino
Messaggio originale
Da: pb...@saintmarys.edu
Data: 20/11/2012 21.00
A: Jmol Jmoljmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Ogg: [Jmol-users] Firefox 17
Forefox 17 was released today. I downloaded to see if it will now run
JSMol. It will not.
Hi all,
while working with the Jmol application (13.1.9_dev) I noticed some odd
behaviour:
1) The set selectionHalos on setting is not stable. It is switched off
for example after clicking any of the toolbar icons in the third or
fourth group.
2) Entering the mouse selection mode by
Well, it's been a busy three months! Hard to believe that I started this
Aug 26, and we basically now have a fully functional Jmol applet without
Java.
I have updated http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jsmol.zip
http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jsmol/test2.htm
demonstrates reading binary Spartan
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Rolf Huehne rhue...@fli-leibniz.dewrote:
Hi all,
while working with the Jmol application (13.1.9_dev) I noticed some odd
behaviour:
1) The set selectionHalos on setting is not stable. It is switched off
for example after clicking any of the toolbar
2) Entering the mouse selection mode by using the toolbar icon
deselects all atoms. This doesn't happen if the popup menu is used
instead
I see this logical. If I go into mouse selection I am not expecting
to work against an already selected full set. So the previous select
none
On 11/21/2012 06:12 PM, Robert Hanson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Rolf Huehne rhue...@fli-leibniz.dewrote:
Hi all,
while working with the Jmol application (13.1.9_dev) I noticed some odd
behaviour:
1) The set selectionHalos on setting is not stable. It is switched off
On 11/21/2012 06:33 PM, Angel Herráez wrote:
2) Entering the mouse selection mode by using the toolbar icon
deselects all atoms. This doesn't happen if the popup menu is used
instead
I see this logical. If I go into mouse selection I am not expecting
to work against an already
On 11/21/2012 06:02 PM, Robert Hanson wrote:
Well, it's been a busy three months! Hard to believe that I started this
Aug 26, and we basically now have a fully functional Jmol applet without
Java.
I have updated http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jsmol.zip
I tried the new version but Firefox
thanks. This is a step I forget because it doesn't affect my browser. Those
are byte-order marks I don't know how to prevent but I know how to remove.
Please try that again at
http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jsmol/test2.htm
or
http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jsmol.zip
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at
Bob et al,
I am pleased to report that loading of Spartan files e.g.molecule.spardir works
beautifully.
It just keeps getting more like Jmol. Thanks Bob!
All the best
Nick
--
3D Organic Animations http://www.chemtube3d.com
Tel: +44 (0)151-794-3506 (3500 secretary)
On 21 Nov
This now works on Mac Firefox 17.0 - very fast load even after cache is cleared.
Otis
--
Otis Rothenberger
o...@chemagic.com
http://chemagic.com
On Nov 21, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Robert Hanson wrote:
thanks. This is a step I forget because it doesn't affect my browser. Those
are byte-order
Yeah, I was just checking that.
I downloaded JSmol.zip this morning and I am getting error in loading
core.z.js
After checking the js console errors, I located many lines that have a strange
invisible character at the beginning of line. I could select one (together with
the next few letters)
Ok, after sorting out my problems with the JSmol file set, I can now --again--
assert that where one JSmol works, two don't.
This is my test code:
var myJmol1,myJmol2;
var myInfo = {
height: '50%',
width: '100%',
jarFile: JmolApplet.jar,
jarPath: '..',
I've tried minifying JSmol (yes, again), with the new version. After gziping by
the server, the results are :
- 720kB with WebGL
- 666kB without WebGL
(including 4kB just for the HTML page)
(I don't have the extra download of 40+ files, as I had previously so the
minifying process works as
Dear Jmol users,
Can you please help me? I need to plot the weighted sum of the squares of
Molecular Orbitals from a Molden output file.
The first problem I had is that the code I used didn't add a space between the
(Atoms) and (Angs) keywords, and Jmol was expecting that space (Molden gave
OK, Angel,
That's a good test. A few problems there.
(1) a bug in the Java2Script library was causing the location of
j2sjmol.lib to be miscalculated -- fixed (see
http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jsmol/j2s/j2sjmol.js, line 3791, Renjian)
(2) incomplete Info object -- You need an explicit
Q: What is the physical significance of sum of squares of orbitals?
Electron density would be the square of the sum, not the sum of the
squares. Right?
Bob
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Leonardo Matheus Marion Jorge
leo...@usp.br wrote:
Dear Jmol users,
Can you please help me? I need to
OK. Found one. Minimization is not feasible. Just way too slow.
--
Robert M. Hanson
Larson-Anderson Professor of Chemistry
Chair, Chemistry Department
St. Olaf College
Northfield, MN
http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr
If nature does not answer first what we want,
it is better to take what
A: I want to examine the excitons, using the approach of
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jz200472a
to look at the spatial distribution of electron and hole.
Thanks,
Leonardo Jorge
PhD Student, USP - Brazil
Nanomol group
http://nanomol.if.usp.br
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 21:38:56 -0600
19 matches
Mail list logo
