You should be able to set that to whatever you want. Smaller numbers are
LOWER resolution.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Andriy Zhugayevych wrote:
> The minimum isosurface resolution is 1. I mean that the command
> "isosurface resolution 0.9 molecular" produces the same surface as the
> comm
This problem basically disappears when using JSmol.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Angel Herráez wrote:
> Hello, Henry
>
> Yes, that is becoming a nuisance.
> For me (Windows), although copy does not work, selecting the text and
> dragging it to a text editor works, depending on the precise t
The minimum isosurface resolution is 1. I mean that the command "isosurface
resolution 0.9 molecular" produces the same surface as the command "isosurface
resolution 1 molecular". For large molecules thus generated surface contains
too much vertices to solve some electrostatic problems like coar
Where we cross in the night, Kevin, is in what we imagine people wanting to
do with "scripting" I think. While people could tap into the core of JSmol
and learn how to manipulate the model directly, writing something that,
say, allowed the selection of atoms and then centered the display on them,
i
First, let me add my kudos to the ASTONISHING progress Bob has made
with JSmol. And Angel, WOW, seeing our old DNA tutorial work without
java is also astonishing.
In Windows 7, I find huge speed differences between browsers for
JSmol. Sorry if this has already been reported.
Bottom line:
Wind
Hello, Henry
Yes, that is becoming a nuisance.
For me (Windows), although copy does not work, selecting the text and
dragging it to a text editor works, depending on the precise text editor
(cannot give a rule for them, even Word may accept the drag).
A colleague using Mac reported this procedu
Hi all,
I followed this email train from July 11
http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/SWtc4LOjGeYDB1POuhuh .
I used to be able to do this but haven't had the need to until today when I
wanted to make a .jvxl file by pasting from the console. No luck.
Thanks
Henry Jakubowski (CSB/SJU)
I'll share my experience in Windows on this issue:
Today my Firefox also started blocking the Java plugin I had.
After an update from java.com, the plugin is not fully blocked but
Firefox is asking for permission to run each instance of Jmol applet
(unsigned) -- at least on first use of that app
There was an actively used zero-day exploit in Java 7 that made Apple and
Mozilla to black-list the Java 1.7.0_10 plugin:
[1]
http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/Java-plugins-unplugged-by-Mozilla-and-Apple-Update-1782628.html
However today Oracle has released an update fixing that issue:
[2
Hi Bob,
I get it, you are biased towards JSmol as I am biased towards the ChemDoodle
Web Components. Certainly you are an authority on Jmol, but when it comes to
the ChemDoodle Web Components and to WebGL your knowledge is lacking at best.
I'm not interested in starting a flame war here, I only
It's the same scripting language.
Sent from my stupid iPhone
On Jan 14, 2013, at 3:26 AM, "Angel Herráez" wrote:
> Quick question:
>
> Can the (recently implemented) pop-up menu in JSmol be
> disabled/enabled?
>
> It would be good to have that feature and, if possible, to use
> something
Quick question:
Can the (recently implemented) pop-up menu in JSmol be
disabled/enabled?
It would be good to have that feature and, if possible, to use
something similar to the applet method, i.e. "set disablePopupMenu
TRUE" in script
Another choice would be some tag in the Info variable
12 matches
Mail list logo
