[Jmol-users] wrong state after "calculate hydrogens"

2014-03-01 Thread Angel Herráez
Hello I have a tricky issue in saving and retrieving the state after the model has been modified by calculate hydrogens; minimize; or minimize addHydrogens; Summary: Running the state as a script brings a model with all hydrogens and some other atoms also as hydrogens (but not all); other

Re: [Jmol-users] wrong state after "calculate hydrogens"

2014-03-01 Thread Otis Rothenberger
Angel, When I run this with cyclopropane, there appears to be a ZAP in the state script before the H atom append that is causing the problem. See below: load inline "C1CC1\nJME 2013-10-12 Sat Mar 01 08:49:47 GMT-500 2014\n \n 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0999 V2000\n1.40000.0.0

Re: [Jmol-users] wrong state after "calculate hydrogens"

2014-03-01 Thread Angel Herráez
Thanks, Otis Good catch! That allows me to patch the script and fix the problem. Cheers, -- Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with Net

Re: [Jmol-users] saving a model from JSmol - folder choice dialog?

2014-03-01 Thread Robert Hanson
My understanding is that that is the way it works. It has to go to a server and come back. There is no FileSaver object the way there is FileReader. But see what you can find. On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Angel Herráez wrote: > Hi all > > I have read about this, but cannot find the proper p

Re: [Jmol-users] wrong state after "calculate hydrogens"

2014-03-01 Thread Robert Hanson
compiling now On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Angel Herráez wrote: > Thanks, Otis > Good catch! > > That allows me to patch the script and fix the problem. > > Cheers, > > > > -- > Flow-based real-time traffic analy

Re: [Jmol-users] wrong state after "calculate hydrogens"

2014-03-01 Thread Robert Hanson
curiously, that's supposed to read: load /*file*/ inline That's the real problem. I wonder why that is not there? On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Otis Rothenberger wrote: > Angel, > > When I run this with cyclopropane, there appears to be a *ZAP* in the > state script before the H atom appe

Re: [Jmol-users] wrong state after "calculate hydrogens"

2014-03-01 Thread Robert Hanson
jmol-14.1.11_2014.03.01.zip On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Robert Hanson wrote: > curiously, that's supposed to read: > > load /*file*/ inline > > That's the real problem. I wonder why that is not there? > > > > On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Otis Rothenberger > wrote: > >> Angel, >> >> Wh

Re: [Jmol-users] wrong state after "calculate hydrogens"

2014-03-01 Thread Robert Hanson
http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/zip/jmol-14.1.11_2014.03.01.zip On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Robert Hanson wrote: > jmol-14.1.11_2014.03.01.zip > > > On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Robert Hanson wrote: > >> curiously, that's supposed to read: >> >> load /*file*/ inline >> >> That's the r

Re: [Jmol-users] povray problem in 14.1.11_2014.02.26

2014-03-01 Thread Ivan Pavicevic
Povray works again on my linux system, after updated to Jmol-14.1.11_2014.03.01-1 :) Thanks! On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 1:41 AM, Ivan Pavicevic wrote: > Yes, of course, povray works fine, compiled from source and optimized > with SlackBuild script to use both cores in 64bit. I have used with > previ

Re: [Jmol-users] How to specific paired atoms in "compare" script

2014-03-01 Thread Robert Hanson
Yes, that's probably the most straightforward way. No { } or spaces necessary around @n: compare {1.1} {2.1} SUBSET {*} ATOMS @1@2 @2@3 @3@4 @4@1 rotate translate 2 "@2" represents "atomno=2" in both models, but the {1.1} and {2.1} do the appropriate filtering so that it will be 1.1&@1 2.1 &

[Jmol-users] compare two structures.

2014-03-01 Thread Robert Hanson
I thought I would share this solution because I can't think of any program that has ever done this before, and it's pretty easy in Jmol, and it relates to a recent posting. Problem: I have two models for the same compound, from two different sources, such as PubChem and NCI. Or in this case EPFL (

[Jmol-users] Jmol speed

2014-03-01 Thread Robert Hanson
Is it just my wishful thinking, or does it seem like this version of Jmol at http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jsmol/jsmol.htm is faster and smoother than previous versions? Thanks to Otis and Ron and Angel and Charles and Alexander for the timely observations this week. I plan to release Jmol 14.0