Paul and Bob,
Got it.
Part of my confusion here is how archaic my code was - circa 2009:
scpt = 'set Picking OFF;set Picking ON;set BondPicking TRUE;set
allowRotateSelected TRUE;unbind "LEFT-DRAG";bind "LEFT-DRAG" "quit;if (_X <
250){select WITHIN(BRANCH,{atomno=rot2}, {atomno=rot1})} else {se
Otis,
what Bob means is that the command « set picking rotatebond » by itself is not
broken. But it requires a key modifier + mouse drag combination to work. What I
did on my webpage (thanks to the code I saw on yours) is to as a bind command
as previously explained, so that no key modifier is r
Bob,
I’m not seeing what your note suggests on Paul’s page. No modifier key is
required from what I’m seeing. You give up model translation by doing this, but
the point is to make it work on a touch pad. By unbinding default left-click
and binding it to bond rotation, only click (or touch) drag
It's working. But how it works is less than obvious. After clicking on a
bond such that the two highlighted atoms stay highlighted, move off past
the end you want to rotate, press SHIFT, and drag.
--
___
Right - it's the matrix multiplication that is filling the wrong variable
with the changed value. I have that fixed but do not have time to release
it right now.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Angel Herráez wrote:
> Hi Bob
>
> Yes, it's working perfectly. Thanks!
> Note: new p1 is different th
Hey Paul,
I really like what your page is doing. I divide my window into two segements,
and the rotated group changes depending on which side gets the click-drag. It
looks like your screen has three parts, with the middle component rotating both
branches. I like that.
My code predates the Jmol
Hi Bob
Yes, it's working perfectly. Thanks!
Note: new p1 is different than old p1 (as you said) but it does not match p11
This is with 14.4.0_2015.10.13 application
rotaProt = compare( {*.CA/2.1 & polymer=8} {*.CA/1.1 & polymer=8} );
show rotaProt;
// rotaProt =
[[-0.7424616,0.2323488,-0.628303
Thank-you for the pointer.
I think we have two different implementations. From what I can guess from your
webpage, once the user clicks a bond, the scripts somehow selects one of the
group from either side of the bond to allow it to rotate (an « allow
rotateselected » flag is set in the console)
A couple of issues there --
1) Jmol is not set up to allow m4 * pt
2) You should be able to use
m3 = m4%1
t = m4%2
pt1 = m3 * pt + t
However there is a bug there, as well. No problem if you don't care, but
after that operation pt *itself* has been rotated and translated. This is a
bug.
Hmm. Jmol is not recognizing a 4x4 array as a matrix. I'll look into that.
--
___
Jmol-users mailing list
Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/
Thanks, Bob
Aha, the mysteries of matrix multiplication :-D
I circumvented my problem creating dummy atoms and applying the rotation
to them. But anyway I'd like to do it this way.
Still, I cannot make it work
rotaProt = compare( {*.CA/2.1 & polymer=8} {*.CA/1.1 & polymer=8} )
show rotaProt
11 matches
Mail list logo
